Subject:
|
RE: A BricksWest Critique?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.events.brickswest
|
Date:
|
Sat, 31 Aug 2002 03:33:22 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1124 times
|
| |
|
|
Hello,
I was wondering if anything has come out of this conversation.
Is there an organization group for 2003 version of Brick West??
Is Matthew going to run it? (Fine with me)
I remember Matthew saying he was going to write something back late in
July.
Any trip to Southern California automatically becomes a family vacation
therefore holding at Lego Land is fine with me.
Bill
-----Original Message-----
From: news-gateway@lugnet.com [mailto:news-gateway@lugnet.com] On Behalf
Of mfuss903
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 1:07 PM
To: lugnet.events.brickswest@lugnet.com
Subject: Re: A BricksWest Critique?
In lugnet.events.brickswest, Todd Thuma writes:
<snip>
> I have been afraid of this last statement.
lol! I was not trying to put you on the spot or anything, I am glad you
did
not take it that way, whew! ;)
<snip>
> I question though why you think Matthew should "automatically" (not • your word)
> be in charge if he wants to be. Nothing, and I mean nothing, against • Matthew
> but this event called BricksWest is about the AFOLs and hopefully • CFOLs. It
> should be run by fans, as many fans as want to participate. It should • be >headed
> by one individual, true, but not necessarily the same individual from • year to
> year. Matthew should play a role in it this year and ever year he wants • to be
> involved. Anybody that wants to be involved should play a role,too.
Yes, I agree. But I think Matt should have the first chance to take it,
or
turn it down simply because he has worked with the people before, and
would
carryover a working knowledge of what to do (and more importantly, what
not
to do). But by all means, he should have a team, committie or whatever
there
to support him. Every team, committie or whatever needs a leader to
actually
acomplish somehting and that is the role that I think Matt should play
(as
long as he wants to). Now if LUGOLA or SCLTC get a more and deeper
working
in it (they would be BW's version of Wamalug for example) then I am all
for
it. You do not have ot sell me on this idea, as it is a good one - but a
head person is needed IMHO, whoever it is.
> We should have an opening ceremony where he is carried in on a chair • made of
> bricks wearing a crown of bricks and carrying a royal staff created of • bricks
> (any body interested in creating these).
LOL! That would be classic! But we would need some Duplo and LOTS of
cameras!
> For being the originator he should
> always be held in high regard and special esteem, but should he always • be in
> charge? That is truely a question and is not rhetorical. I welcome • anybody's
> opinion on this as I have not answered the question myself
satisfactorily yet.
I think another reason for this is so we can have a person to have
people
contact. I think saying 'Go talk to that person' is better than 'Go talk
to
somebody in that group over there'. And having one person year after
year
would provide stability unlike a revolving door (or in this case -
seat).
And even if you had a group run it, the makeup of that group would
(could?)
change lessening the stability of the group (IMHO). (and this also goes
to
the snippage that was below)
Mark
http://www.landofbricks.com
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: A BricksWest Critique?
|
| (...) Hi Bill - I'm speaking quasi-officially as one of the BricksWest organizers for last year and for this year. I have been in discussions with Matt recently about BricksWest 2003, and we are working on getting some news out, and starting a round (...) (22 years ago, 31-Aug-02, to lugnet.events.brickswest)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: A BricksWest Critique?
|
| In lugnet.events.brickswest, Todd Thuma writes: <snip> (...) lol! I was not trying to put you on the spot or anything, I am glad you did not take it that way, whew! ;) <snip> (...) Yes, I agree. But I think Matt should have the first chance to take (...) (22 years ago, 11-Jul-02, to lugnet.events.brickswest)
|
60 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
