Subject:
|
Re: A BricksWest Critique?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.events.brickswest
|
Date:
|
Thu, 11 Jul 2002 20:07:06 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1154 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.events.brickswest, Todd Thuma writes:
<snip>
> I have been afraid of this last statement.
lol! I was not trying to put you on the spot or anything, I am glad you did
not take it that way, whew! ;)
<snip>
> I question though why you think Matthew should "automatically" (not your word)
> be in charge if he wants to be. Nothing, and I mean nothing, against Matthew
> but this event called BricksWest is about the AFOLs and hopefully CFOLs. It
> should be run by fans, as many fans as want to participate. It should be >headed
> by one individual, true, but not necessarily the same individual from year to
> year. Matthew should play a role in it this year and ever year he wants to be
> involved. Anybody that wants to be involved should play a role,too.
Yes, I agree. But I think Matt should have the first chance to take it, or
turn it down simply because he has worked with the people before, and would
carryover a working knowledge of what to do (and more importantly, what not
to do). But by all means, he should have a team, committie or whatever there
to support him. Every team, committie or whatever needs a leader to actually
acomplish somehting and that is the role that I think Matt should play (as
long as he wants to). Now if LUGOLA or SCLTC get a more and deeper working
in it (they would be BW's version of Wamalug for example) then I am all for
it. You do not have ot sell me on this idea, as it is a good one - but a
head person is needed IMHO, whoever it is.
> We should have an opening ceremony where he is carried in on a chair made of
> bricks wearing a crown of bricks and carrying a royal staff created of bricks
> (any body interested in creating these).
LOL! That would be classic! But we would need some Duplo and LOTS of cameras!
> For being the originator he should
> always be held in high regard and special esteem, but should he always be in
> charge? That is truely a question and is not rhetorical. I welcome anybody's
> opinion on this as I have not answered the question myself satisfactorily yet.
I think another reason for this is so we can have a person to have people
contact. I think saying 'Go talk to that person' is better than 'Go talk to
somebody in that group over there'. And having one person year after year
would provide stability unlike a revolving door (or in this case - seat).
And even if you had a group run it, the makeup of that group would (could?)
change lessening the stability of the group (IMHO). (and this also goes to
the snippage that was below)
Mark
http://www.landofbricks.com
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: A BricksWest Critique?
|
| Comments below... (...) No, I didn't feel that way. I was simply afraid after re-reading my own posts that it sounded that I was angling for that. I wasn't. The person in charge takes on a huge headache when they agree to run it. That's why I think (...) (22 years ago, 12-Jul-02, to lugnet.events.brickswest)
| | | RE: A BricksWest Critique?
|
| Hello, I was wondering if anything has come out of this conversation. Is there an organization group for 2003 version of Brick West?? Is Matthew going to run it? (Fine with me) I remember Matthew saying he was going to write something back late in (...) (22 years ago, 31-Aug-02, to lugnet.events.brickswest)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: A BricksWest Critique?
|
| (...) I have been afraid of this last statement. I really do not think I am in a position geographically that would lead me to be able to lead this kind of an effort. I live in Georgia and the event is going to happen somewhere on the west coast. (...) (22 years ago, 11-Jul-02, to lugnet.events.brickswest)
|
60 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
