Subject:
|
Re: A BricksWest Critique?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.events.brickswest
|
Date:
|
Thu, 11 Jul 2002 14:06:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1057 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.events.brickswest, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.events.brickswest, Matthew Gerber writes:
> > In lugnet.events.brickswest, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > > In lugnet.events.brickswest, James Brown writes:
> > > > In lugnet.events.brickswest, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > > > > In lugnet.events.brickswest, Matthew Gerber writes:
> > > > >
> > > > > > There WILL be a BW03...make no mistake
> > > > > > about it.
> > > > >
> > > > > ?? Did I miss BW 02 ? I thought last year was BW 01?
> > > >
> > > > BW (20)03.
> > >
> > > Thanks. An apostrophe was omitted, then. Correct usage for date oriented
> > > appelations is either
> > >
> > > BW 2003
> > >
> > > or
> > >
> > > BW '03
> > >
> > > but not BW 03...
> > >
> > > as to do that engenders confusion :-)
> >
> > Thank you for so aptly proving an earlier point about public discussion.
>
> What point was that? If this was sarcasm, it was lost on me, I am afraid. My
> sole goal is clarity.
I think Matt's point was that he felt that private discussion was best for
the planning and organizing....he felt that individuals like you, me, and
others (James Brown) are pretty well non participants that wouldn't help
the cause....
you may have wanted some clarity, but I think Matt thought it was a proof
to ensure that there would NOT be public discussion....
Ben
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
60 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
