Subject:
|
Re: A BricksWest Critique?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.events.brickswest
|
Date:
|
Sat, 13 Jul 2002 05:54:47 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1083 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.events.brickswest, Frank Filz writes:
> Todd Thuma wrote:
> > I must admit, not yet being a full throttle train fanatic I must have missed
> > something at BW02. Why does it have to be one club organizing the train stuff
> > at BW03. Wouldn't it be great if we could get 4 or 5 clubs together and fill a
> > whol tent by itself for 2 or 3 days? What about going for a world's record in
> > Guiness? It would certainly prompt Lego to get involved if just such an effort
> > was planned to be big.
>
> I absolutely agree that the train layout should be more than one club.
> The tent probably isn't big enough to set a world record for length of
> track though (PNLTC set a record a couple years ago in a much bigger
> space). It might be possible to set a record for size of complete layout
> with scenery, though that would mean that would be all that's in the
> tent (since PNLTC did a pretty good job of filling the tent with train
> layout last year). We might have to work really hard to beat the record
> on number of bricks used in a LEGO train layout (the GMLTC layout uses
> quite a few more bricks per square foot than any other LEGO train
> layout).
>
> Frank
Frank,
To set the record straight The PNLTC was not at the BW03. Dan Parker from
the PNLTC ran the pavillion but the large layout was done by SCLTC.
Paul
SCLTC
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: A BricksWest Critique?
|
| (...) I absolutely agree that the train layout should be more than one club. The tent probably isn't big enough to set a world record for length of track though (PNLTC set a record a couple years ago in a much bigger space). It might be possible to (...) (22 years ago, 12-Jul-02, to lugnet.events.brickswest)
|
60 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
