| |
Mike Stanley wrote:
> I'm probably in the minority here, but guess what? I don't care. I
> think what Kevin has done with Brickshelf.com is AWESOME. Utterly
> and completely AWESOME. I applaud his effort 100%. But you know
> what? For all the scans I've browsed through and even considering I
> ran wget once to grab the whole site, I don't need them. Don't need
> them at all. You might. Todd might. Most people may think they
> need them. But if TLC stomped brickshelf out of existence today it
> wouldn't really *hurt* me. Inconvenience me from time to time,
> perhaps, but not much.
Just stepping in to point out that the scans are invaluable to me and I
would be impacted by not having them around. At least, I *would* be if I
got off my duff and started turning the 200+ pounds of used, unsorted
LEGO back into sets again. I really need to, I have some doozies in that
pile too, like at least 1 airport shuttle, a whole bunch of not much
newer than 375 castles and some very classic grey space stuff.
In general, I think we all need to heed each other's calls for civility,
though...
--
Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com http://my.voyager.net/lar
- - - Web Application Integration! http://www.novera.com
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to lugnet.
NOTE: Soon to be lpieniazek@tsisoft.com :-)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Enough already
|
| (...) I'm probably in the minority here, but guess what? I don't care. I think what Kevin has done with Brickshelf.com is AWESOME. Utterly and completely AWESOME. I applaud his effort 100%. But you know what? For all the scans I've browsed through (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.admin.general)
|
72 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
