To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.dear-legoOpen lugnet.dear-lego in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Dear LEGO / 970
969  |  971
Subject: 
Re: Enough already
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Mon, 20 Dec 1999 18:20:22 GMT
Viewed: 
2281 times
  
Mike Stanley wrote:

Robert M. Dye <robdye@writeme.com> wrote:
I said what I said, and I stand by it. The fellow (I have not gone back to
look up who it was) who took the tack of "Oh, yeah!?! PROVE it!" came across
to me as a moron. I do not say that he is one (although I admit that this is
a very small distinction), but that IS how he struck me.  Will you fault me
for the impression I receieve of someone?  That seems an odd position to
take.

I am not sure, but it sort of looks as though Mike Stanley attributed the
"he struck me as a moron" comment to Todd.  That was NOT Todd speaking, it
was me.

I know it was you, and I certainly didn't try to imply it was Todd
saying that, although Todd said some thing that got me riled
yesterday.

And yes, there is _little_ distinction between calling someone a
moron and saying they strike you as a moron.  If I said you struck
me as a jackass would that offend you less than if I called you a
jackass?  Phrases like "came across as" "strikes me as" "seems like"
etc are all phrases that people employ to, on the surface at least,
remove themselves from the active nature of what they're saying.

And no, I wouldn't fault you for your impressions.  I'd fault you
for your lack of tact in describing another very important member of
our community whose feelings as a _human being_ ought to matter to
you a helluva lot more than how much a corporation "feels" we
respect it.

No skin off my nose - I know my IQ, and it's well over to the higher end of the
scale (and I mean WELL over) ;-)  (IQ != common sense, however)

I stand by my "PROVE IT" comments.

I wanted proof from TLC, and I got it, end of story - until we actually heard
from TLC, then people stating that TLC meant X were more in error than me stating
that "maybe they didn't mean X, give me  proof they did"  ;-)  In fact, I'd
consider my stance more intelligent - I was asking for proof, rather than
assuming I KNEW what TLC wanted.

I still don't agree with their stance on URLs on their site, however.



Just like I'd say how we treat Brad out to be respectful even if we
admit we have quite a bit less respect for the company he works for.

Oh yes, definitely - ALWAYS make sure to treat someone with respect, and
disconnect the person from the company (I guess I need to practice what I
preach).  I definitely respect Brad, and generally respect TLC, but I feel there
is no need to ignore when TLC as a whole is being boneheaded about something ;-)


--
| Tom Stangl, Technical Support          Netscape Communications Corp
|      Please do not associate my personal views with my employer



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Enough already
 
(...) I know it was you, and I certainly didn't try to imply it was Todd saying that, although Todd said some thing that got me riled yesterday. And yes, there is _little_ distinction between calling someone a moron and saying they strike you as a (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.admin.general)

72 Messages in This Thread:






























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR