To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.dear-legoOpen lugnet.dear-lego in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Dear LEGO / 970
969  |  971
Subject: 
Re: Enough already
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Mon, 20 Dec 1999 18:20:22 GMT
Viewed: 
4925 times
  
Mike Stanley wrote:

> Robert M. Dye <robdye@writeme.com> wrote:
> > I said what I said, and I stand by it. The fellow (I have not gone back to
> > look up who it was) who took the tack of "Oh, yeah!?! PROVE it!" came across
> > to me as a moron. I do not say that he is one (although I admit that this is
> > a very small distinction), but that IS how he struck me.  Will you fault me
> > for the impression I receieve of someone?  That seems an odd position to
> > take.
> > 
> > I am not sure, but it sort of looks as though Mike Stanley attributed the
> > "he struck me as a moron" comment to Todd.  That was NOT Todd speaking, it
> > was me.
> 
> I know it was you, and I certainly didn't try to imply it was Todd
> saying that, although Todd said some thing that got me riled
> yesterday.
> 
> And yes, there is _little_ distinction between calling someone a
> moron and saying they strike you as a moron.  If I said you struck
> me as a jackass would that offend you less than if I called you a
> jackass?  Phrases like "came across as" "strikes me as" "seems like"
> etc are all phrases that people employ to, on the surface at least,
> remove themselves from the active nature of what they're saying.
> 
> And no, I wouldn't fault you for your impressions.  I'd fault you
> for your lack of tact in describing another very important member of
> our community whose feelings as a _human being_ ought to matter to
> you a helluva lot more than how much a corporation "feels" we
> respect it.

No skin off my nose - I know my IQ, and it's well over to the higher end of the
scale (and I mean WELL over) ;-)  (IQ != common sense, however)

I stand by my "PROVE IT" comments.

I wanted proof from TLC, and I got it, end of story - until we actually heard
from TLC, then people stating that TLC meant X were more in error than me stating
that "maybe they didn't mean X, give me  proof they did"  ;-)  In fact, I'd
consider my stance more intelligent - I was asking for proof, rather than
assuming I KNEW what TLC wanted.

I still don't agree with their stance on URLs on their site, however.


> 
> Just like I'd say how we treat Brad out to be respectful even if we
> admit we have quite a bit less respect for the company he works for.

Oh yes, definitely - ALWAYS make sure to treat someone with respect, and
disconnect the person from the company (I guess I need to practice what I
preach).  I definitely respect Brad, and generally respect TLC, but I feel there
is no need to ignore when TLC as a whole is being boneheaded about something ;-)


--
| Tom Stangl, Technical Support          Netscape Communications Corp
|      Please do not associate my personal views with my employer



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Enough already
 
(...) I know it was you, and I certainly didn't try to imply it was Todd saying that, although Todd said some thing that got me riled yesterday. And yes, there is _little_ distinction between calling someone a moron and saying they strike you as a (...) (27 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.admin.general)

72 Messages in This Thread:






























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR