To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.dear-legoOpen lugnet.dear-lego in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Dear LEGO / 942
941  |  943
Subject: 
Re: Enough already
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.dear-lego
Date: 
Sun, 19 Dec 1999 22:40:32 GMT
Viewed: 
1769 times
  
Hear, hear!  IMHO, all of this backlash is ridiculous.  The LEGO Company is
being *extremely* generous in allowing scans of any their copyrighted • materials
up on websites *at all*[1].  Yet, all some people can do is complain that • they
aren't getting enough.


Lego is being generous? I would say they're being practical, having
concluded that the ill-will generated and costs involved in pursiring the
removal of scans is not worth the perceived benefit. Let's not forget that
this is a corporation we're talking about.

Someone yesterday even called it a "tragedy" that recently leaked retailer
catalog scans were taken down, calling them "previews" rather than what • they
really were.  Short of calling statements like that entirely absurd, it's • hard
not to point out that statements like that show immense amounts of
disrespect.


That someone was me. Statements like that show immense amounts of
disrespect? Coincidentally, this is exactly what AFOLs have been getting
from TLG for YEARS. This recent development of Brad Justus posting is a
positive one, but let's see where it goes before we all gather around the
campfire singing Koombaya.

It's good to nail down legal idiosyncracies (tactfully and politely, as • Larry
did) and to separate the true legalities from the polite wishes, but • there's a
point where all of the bickering and ungratefulness turns sour and becomes
nothing but annoying noise for Brad and his colleagues.  I don't think LEGO
Direct came here to be disrespected.


Don't worry, I'm sure "annoying noise" has already been factored into the
marketing plan.



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Enough already
 
(...) No, not generous. Practical, yes for them. Nice for us.... Possibly? (...) Just need some clarification.... How do you mean that has TLG been disrespectful to us? By the lack of response to our requests? If this is what you mean, I don't see (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Enough already
 
(...) Hear, hear! IMHO, all of this backlash is ridiculous. The LEGO Company is being *extremely* generous in allowing scans of any their copyrighted materials up on websites *at all*[1]. Yet, all some people can do is complain that they aren't (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)

72 Messages in This Thread:






























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR