To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.dear-legoOpen lugnet.dear-lego in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Dear LEGO / 3321
3320  |  3322
Subject: 
Re: This is stupid... I can't tolerate this *juniorization*...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego
Date: 
Thu, 9 Aug 2001 19:33:03 GMT
Viewed: 
481 times
  
In lugnet.lego.direct, Dan Simonson writes:
Ok, this is going to be a long message.

Just to get who I am straight, I'm Dan Simonson, I'm 13, I've played with
Legos since I was 3. I got a whole bunch of bricks from my sister, who once
got them from my brother, who's 30 now. This is where my passion with Lego
started. I got one of the old dump trucks when I was 3 also. I loved that
thing. Wish I still had it together. Any way, when I was 5 I got the old
Spyrius recon robot for my birthday from a friend. Since I was a Space fan
and later picked up on building a town when I was in 4th grade (about age 9
or 8). To make a long story short I've played with those theme's, Town and
Space,  ever
since.

I recently got the Lego summer catalog. I ordered some bulk packs (in my
opinion way over priced for *bulk*) and a pack of two T-Plates for my town's
new layout. When I first opened it though I saw this stupid looking thing
called Jack Stone. I immediately though it was for three year olds, that it
was a
duplo set, and was immediately angry. The buildings have nothing to them! It
reminds me of the old cheap show James Bond Junior from when I was 4. After
recieving a Mania Magazine about it I think I almost got a headache. There's
no
point to it!

Another example of my dislike for juniorization is from when I turned 10, I
got a construction crew. I was glad I got the set because at the time I had
no construction crew for my little town. When I saw the directions I
immediately wanted to write Lego because they were so poor in quality. A two
year old could have done it with out his parents help. I never got the
chance to, wasn't that important. Now I have my chance.

I'm now reading the catalog, I'm going to bash everthing juniorized as I go
along.

Page 1, *Bionicle.* When I first saw Bionicle I thought it was aimed at the
Japanese market than anything else. It reminds me of the edited Dragon Ball
Z, a show so watered down and milked up that it's no wonder I don't like it
any more. One fight between two characters lasted 3-4 weeks.

Page 5, DIONSAURS. The last time I had any interest in Dinosaurs was when I
was in Kindergarden. I see where it comes in with Jurasic Park III and the
Lego Studios but do you have to release and waste all that petrolium (yes,
it's a non-renewable resource) on a hole bunch of dinosaurs we really don't
even need. And at $10 a piece, what 5 year old can even afford to waste $40
on them.

Pages 8-9, Great mechs, but the ship and the base make me laugh. What kind
of base is that! It looks like an Aquanaut base I made once that was made of
little gobs of bricks that are separated and serve no purpose but to to look
cool. $80 for that junk! I wouldn't pay $50.

Page 13, Mega Blok, or Lego? When I saw this I was more sickened than when I
saw Jack Stone. 8 pieces per car!!!!! WHAT THE HELL, TECH DECK SKATEBOARDS
HAVE MORE LITTLE TINY SCREWS IN THEM THAN THAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Page 16-17, just one more adden to JACK STONE. How can he get away with
being a cop and fire fighter? To be on the optimistic side of this BS, there
a blue flame and a black raft. Those are pretty neat.

Page 22-23, Duplo, where Juniorization should stay.

Page 24-27, the best new thing Lego has made in a long time.

Page 47, the leg henges are nice for Mechs.

One additional comment before my extreme rage burns out...

Ok, I remember not long ago Lego sent out this little yellow thing with
their s@h
orders about their mission statement or something like that. It said that
Lego is a creative toy, becuase one day, it can be a submarine, the next it
can be castle, and the next it can be a spaceship. Many of the things I have
seen in the last catalog have made that mission statement worthless and
obselete.

This is Lego's true purpose...
http://www.nwlink.com/~sandlin/lego/mecha/colossus/colossus01.html


--
Chef/Dan/Bubba Bear
ICQ:84584424
AIM: DaGlassAWasta
http://lostislandofmonkeys.cjb.net



Dan, Lego is really out of their minds for making "Jack Stone". FYI Lego, my
name is Joe Franco, im 16, and I have been playing with Lego for 13 years. I
used to like your sets, because of the challenge of building them. When I
was smaller, I used to wait after school for the mail man to come deliever
our mail in hopes that my Lego S@H or Mania CLub catalog would come. When it
did, I would read and stair at it for a few hours, in awe, at all of the big
sets and great themes that you had in it. Now, when i got my S@H catalog, I
almost cried. Thanks for bringing ack the Guarded inn and making the MOT
train line, but the rest of these sets are juniorized to the point that it
could take only 5 minutes to build a building. Wheres the Challenge in that?
When I got my Pier police set for Christmas, it took me a half hour just to
build the building. I loved the challenge and time it took to watch the
building take shape. That was then. Now, I turned to Page 17, where the new
police station is, and it only has 137 pieces in it. THATS IT. Its heavily
over priced at $70, and it just sucks. I could build it in 2 minutes, the
WHOLE THING. The parts are more simple, and crappier, and there is no Police
station that looks like that- at least not on this planet. The Res-Q theme
looks like a construction theme, and the fire truck looks like its got a
face on the front end. Why are these sets becoming more and more juniorized?
Will we ever see new sets that would take time and EFFORT to build, or is
this what our future generations looking foward too? I've just about had it
with Lego, and I will only buy older sets from 1996-down. The only newer
set(s) I will buy is 2 10001 Metroliners and a few 10002 Club Cars, and
maybe some bulk and train parts. Thats it. Joe



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: This is stupid... I can't tolerate this *juniorization*...
 
Okay, Joe (and Dan)- Although I can't speak for TLC, I bet I have a good idea as to what they would say to your collective concerns, and rather than let a brush fire blaze out of control here, let me point out a few things which hopefully will help (...) (23 years ago, 9-Aug-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego)

Message is in Reply To:
  This is stupid... I can't tolerate this *juniorization*...
 
Ok, this is going to be a long message. Just to get who I am straight, I'm Dan Simonson, I'm 13, I've played with Legos since I was 3. I got a whole bunch of bricks from my sister, who once got them from my brother, who's 30 now. This is where my (...) (23 years ago, 9-Aug-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego)

74 Messages in This Thread:































Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR