Subject:
|
Re: DAT voting page up
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Fri, 26 Feb 1999 20:04:10 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2568 times
|
| |
 | |
It's not an update. It's an A/B version thing--Tile 1x1 Old Style, Tile
1x1 New Style.
Steve
On Fri, 26 Feb 1999 16:30:56 GMT, "onyx" <onyx@flash.net> wrote:
> Roy Earls writes:
> > Todd Lehman wrote in message ...
> >
> > > The 2x2x2 crystal ball is not like a tile because tiles have little finger
> > > grooves going all around the bottom edge, and the crystal ball does not.
> >
> > Old version tiles didn't have these grooves and LDraw, to my knowledge,
> > doesn't model it because of precision. Case in point ...
>
> hmmm... i never noticed that before.. that the LDraw model of 3068 (as
> well as other tiles) doesn't have the fingernail groove around the edge...
> although i say that's BS.. in my opinion (looking at a couple stacked here on
> the desk, up against various plates, etc) it looks like that edge is 1LDU in
> height/depth.. that could be edited into the part in like 10 minutes.. why
> AREN'T we using them??? there's no "precision" issue that i see... hmmm... i
> think i'll throw an edited version terry's way and see what he thinks... never
> too late to update...
>
> J
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:  | | Re: DAT voting page up
|
| Since I am not an LDraw part developer (although I did try my hand at one part), I will add my $0.02 to the fracas and be done with it. This outlook is based upon my knowledge of engineering documentation systems in the real world. With that said, (...) (26 years ago, 26-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: DAT voting page up
|
| (...) hmmm... i never noticed that before.. that the LDraw model of 3068 (as well as other tiles) doesn't have the fingernail groove around the edge... although i say that's BS.. in my opinion (looking at a couple stacked here on the desk, up (...) (26 years ago, 26-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
97 Messages in This Thread:         
    
        
        
      
      
    
    
    
    
    
      
      
          
         
      
      
    
      
    
          ![[3068 with groove] (was:DAT voting page up) -Jeff Boen (26-Feb-99 to lugnet.cad.dev)](/news/x.gif)  ![Re: [3068 with groove] (was:DAT voting page up) -Todd Lehman (27-Feb-99 to lugnet.cad.dev)](/news/x.gif)  ![Re: [3068 with groove] (was:DAT voting page up) -Roy Earls (27-Feb-99 to lugnet.cad.dev)](/news/x.gif)  ![Re: [3068 with groove] (was:DAT voting page up) -Paul Gyugyi (2-Mar-99 to lugnet.cad.dev)](/news/x.gif)  ![Re: [3068 with groove] (was:DAT voting page up) -Roy Earls (2-Mar-99 to lugnet.cad.dev)](/news/x.gif)  ![Re: [3068 with groove] (was:DAT voting page up) -Fredrik Glöckner (2-Mar-99 to lugnet.cad.dev)](/news/x.gif)
             ![Re: [3068 with groove] (was:DAT voting page up) -Steve Bliss (2-Mar-99 to lugnet.cad.dev)](/news/x.gif)
             ![Re: [3068 with groove] (was:DAT voting page up) -Selçuk Göre (4-Mar-99 to lugnet.cad.dev)](/news/x.gif)
           ![Re: [3068 with groove] (was:DAT voting page up) -Roy Earls (2-Mar-99 to lugnet.cad.dev)](/news/x.gif)  ![Re: [3068 with groove] (was:DAT voting page up) -Bram Lambrecht (3-Mar-99 to lugnet.cad.dev)](/news/x.gif)  ![Re: [3068 with groove] (was:DAT voting page up) -Selçuk Göre (4-Mar-99 to lugnet.cad.dev)](/news/x.gif)  ![Re: [3068 with groove] (was:DAT voting page up) -Steve Bliss (4-Mar-99 to lugnet.cad.dev)](/news/x.gif)
        ![Re: [3068 with groove] (was:DAT voting page up) -Roy Earls (27-Feb-99 to lugnet.cad.dev)](/news/x.gif)
           
           
         
       
                
         
           
         
          
         
     
      
     
        
        
            
    
      
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|