Subject:
|
Re: DAT voting page up
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Sat, 27 Feb 1999 01:00:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1664 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, wilsonj@xoommail.com (jonathan wilson) writes:
> > The curved edges are an essential part of the piece, especially when
> > viewed in LDLite or POV-Ray. Not modeling them would be like leaving
> > the curved edges off of the Windscreens - the edges are a highly
> > recogizable feature of the part.
>
> the canyon raised baseplate does not have the rounded edges.
Then it's broken too. :)
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: DAT voting page up
|
| (...) True, but it's also a precedent. I'd rather have the bottom surface than curved edges. I'd consider a part with all surfaces more accurate than a part with closely-modeled upper surfaces, but the underside completely missing. Maybe I'm just (...) (25 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
97 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
