Subject:
|
Re: DAT voting page up
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Mon, 1 Mar 1999 15:02:36 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2324 times
|
| |
|
|
On Sat, 27 Feb 1999 01:00:52 GMT, lehman@javanet.com (Todd Lehman)
wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.dev, wilsonj@xoommail.com (jonathan wilson) writes:
> > > The curved edges are an essential part of the piece, especially when
> > > viewed in LDLite or POV-Ray. Not modeling them would be like leaving
> > > the curved edges off of the Windscreens - the edges are a highly
> > > recogizable feature of the part.
> >
> > the canyon raised baseplate does not have the rounded edges.
>
> Then it's broken too. :)
True, but it's also a precedent.
I'd rather have the bottom surface than curved edges. I'd consider a
part with all surfaces more accurate than a part with closely-modeled
upper surfaces, but the underside completely missing. Maybe I'm just
weird.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
97 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
