 | | Updating the LUG map?
|
|
Hi all, Is there any chance the LUG map at (URL) be updated soon? I'ld like to have the Sacramento group added Sacramento Brick Builders (SacBB) since we have a newsgroup here as well. Cheers Roy (21 years ago, 19-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Website Security Certificate
|
|
(...) No, that wouldn't make a difference; both use HTTP and not HTTPS. (...) Strange. Nothing was renewed; there was nothing to renew. What web browser and OS are you using? --Todd (21 years ago, 18-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Website Security Certificate
|
|
(...) I notice that some of my favourites are news.lugnet.com/xyz and others are www.lugnet.com/xyz Does this make any difference? Anyway, whatever had expired has now been renewed so the message no longer appears when I browse. Mark (21 years ago, 17-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Password reset?
|
|
(...) Yes, it is. Thanks! (21 years ago, 17-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: I have some pics that the database needs (set 310)
|
|
(...) Futted to .admin.database in case it gets missed here. ROSCO (21 years ago, 16-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | I have some pics that the database needs
|
|
(URL) Doesn't show any pics and I have some to offer, but I don't know how to upload them to there. So, I decided to make a post and allow some other person upload them for me. Here are my photos. Comes from my own collection, soon to be sold on (...) (21 years ago, 16-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Password reset?
|
|
(...) Adam, You should be all set. --Todd (21 years ago, 16-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Password reset?
|
|
(...) For now, the process is to send a note to Todd, because he has to do it. Providing a mechanism to make this easier is high on the priority list once the code freeze is at an end. If you don't get a response from Todd, mail any of the Admins (...) (21 years ago, 16-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Password reset?
|
|
How do I get my password reset? Or get an old password emailed to me? My member # 1076. Someone please help. (21 years ago, 16-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Website Security Certificate
|
|
(...) Security cert? As in SSL? But lugnet doesn't have (or support!) SSL? What URL are you getting this at? (21 years ago, 11-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Website Security Certificate
|
|
My browser tells me that the Lugnet website security certificate has expired. Mark (21 years ago, 10-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Updated, enhanced LDraw shortcut images in FTX (Re: LDraw shortcut images in FTX)
|
|
(...) DOH! I should never do color codes from memory. (...) :) Steve (22 years ago, 7-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Updated, enhanced LDraw shortcut images in FTX (Re: LDraw shortcut images in FTX)
|
|
(...) Well actually it's 272 but I'll forgive that one :) (...) Thanks for your (and Dans) work on that! The result is great! Mmmmmmmm Dark Blue.... [LDrawPart 3298:272] ROSCO (22 years ago, 6-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Updated, enhanced LDraw shortcut images in FTX (Re: LDraw shortcut images in FTX)
|
|
Can you see them now? Good. Thanks to Dan Boger for setting up a feed between the Peeron and LUGNET servers, allowing the live LDraw parts images to be shared by both sites. So now the LDrawPart tag can not display all the current LDraw parts, it (...) (22 years ago, 6-Jan-05, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.admin.general, FTX) !
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET not accessible due to traffic load
|
|
(...) I believe this isn't an issue of bandwidth limits, but of server load. When the server gets too busy, the CPU just doesn't keep up with all the requests, and the load goes up. And once the load hits a magic number (20, I think?) the server (...) (22 years ago, 4-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET not accessible due to traffic load
|
|
(...) I'm one but this is just me talking, not an official answer. I think the guesses are good though. (...) I have noticed it too... when Todd does, he looks into it. Lately, it usually has been spiders (webcrawlers, bots, whatever) hammering the (...) (22 years ago, 4-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | LUGNET not accessible due to traffic load
|
|
LUGNET Administrators, It seems to me that LUGNET is becoming increasingly not available due to traffic load. Is this perception wrong? If there is some truth to my perception, is there action that can be taken to reduce the dreaded unavailability (...) (22 years ago, 4-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New spotlight weights( was Re: LDraw shortcut images in FTX
|
|
(...) oh Bink I thought I left a hint for you there. Hit me up on AIM when you get a chance - I will let you know there. M *punches this back to plain textt* (22 years ago, 3-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New spotlight weights( was Re: LDraw shortcut images in FTX
|
|
(...) Not sure I see exactly what you're getting at, Mark... could you elaborate where you think there's a specific problem? Thanks, Kelly (22 years ago, 2-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New spotlight weights( was Re: LDraw shortcut images in FTX
|
|
(...) Looks to me as they have a chance to prove you right -- right at this very moment. Did not take long in this 'new year' did it? Shall we sit back and see what, if anything happens? M (22 years ago, 2-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New spotlight weights( was Re: LDraw shortcut images in FTX
|
|
(...) Maybe. But then abuse of the system would lead to time-outs, would it not? If the admins start to see the page leading to too much abuse, I guess maybe then would be a good time to look at removing it. (...) I don't think this is a question of (...) (22 years ago, 1-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New spotlight weights( was Re: LDraw shortcut images in FTX
|
|
(...) My entrie (first) post was about weighting and spotlighting. Nothing in the post was outside of that context, so there was no need to assume there was any more, or different, meaning to it. And no, I did not mean I wanted to see more of any (...) (22 years ago, 1-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New spotlight weights( was Re: LDraw shortcut images in FTX
|
|
(...) I would think that making the weightings available to the public would lead to temptation to abuse the system. IMO. For all I know, though, the entire LUGNET community is 100% Grade A honest. Anyway, my 2. -Vince (22 years ago, 1-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New spotlight weights( was Re: LDraw shortcut images in FTX
|
|
(...) I don't know. Good question. I think you could argue that both ways, but probably it's a good idea. (...) Putting some regularization into the process seems a good idea to me, so ya, there should be. Up till now it has been ad hoc though, I (...) (22 years ago, 1-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New spotlight weights( was Re: LDraw shortcut images in FTX
|
|
(...) A couple of questions: Will these weightings be made available on a page somewhere so everyone can see them anytime? Is there a policy in place to regularly look at these weightings and make adjustments if deemed necessary? Thanks ROSCO (22 years ago, 1-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New spotlight weights( was Re: LDraw shortcut images in FTX
|
|
(...) Mark, I wish you (and others) wouldn't go deleting quotes included for context. I've re-inserted the sentence you removed above, with I assumed to mean you wanted to see posts in .lego and .color, which is the context in which I posted my (...) (22 years ago, 1-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New spotlight weights( was Re: LDraw shortcut images in FTX
|
|
(...) Well ya, thats kinda easy to figure out ;) I never said anything about how this was stopping that process. I know its not, I also know that is not what my post was about in any way. (...) This is kinda more on my point - but still not 100%. (...) (22 years ago, 1-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New spotlight weights( was Re: LDraw shortcut images in FTX
|
|
(...) Mark (and everyone), if you have specific groups you want to see please go to those groups and read them. The spotlight feature is ONLY to choose what gets put on the front page and other "top stories" pages. It is NOT intended to replace your (...) (22 years ago, 31-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New spotlight weights( was Re: LDraw shortcut images in FTX
|
|
(...) Where you said yourself "what we believe" - that tells me you do not know, but are guessing on what you believe to be true. And I know full well the spotlight weighting has been going on for some time and gets changed. I do pay attention (...) (22 years ago, 31-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New spotlight weights( was Re: LDraw shortcut images in FTX
|
|
(...) Although I admittedly would still rather see the weights go down to just +2 for .announce.*, and leave off .announce.moc, .lego, and .color from the list all together, I just had another code-change-necessary thought for weighting... How about (...) (22 years ago, 31-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New spotlight weights( was Re: LDraw shortcut images in FTX
|
|
(...) Why do you think we're guessing? The spotlight function has had weighting for some time. Periodically, that weighting gets adjusted. This was one of those times. (...) We consider and evaluate everyone's opinions, and will include that one, (...) (22 years ago, 31-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | NYCLUG group -- Can it be created?
|
|
Dear Admins: We're relatively new, small but significant, like set 6011. We've done a build event at Enfield. We've held several meetings. Any chance we could get our own group? Thanks much, onedaycnn (sid) (URL) (22 years ago, 30-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New spotlight weights( was Re: LDraw shortcut images in FTX
|
|
(...) -snip- (...) I would think you could figure that out by what they actually DO highlight. Why would you need to try to guess? I WANT to see .color and .lego and if they have to do an uphill battle thats not good IMHO. Seeing posts that have got (...) (22 years ago, 30-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New spotlight weights( was Re: LDraw shortcut images in FTX
|
|
(...) Whoops. Thank you for discovering this. They were in fact completely out-of-sync. I forgot that the news pages use a newer piece of code, different from the old code that the main homepage uses. --Todd (22 years ago, 29-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Change my FLAG, please!
|
|
(...) Unfortunately, there isn't an easy way to do this at the moment. (There ought to be, obviously.) I went in and changed it manually. You're now listed as being in the state of Virginia. (...) That would be helpful. If you could send it to me as (...) (22 years ago, 29-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New spotlight weights( was Re: LDraw shortcut images in FTX
|
|
Huh... Does the weighting on the front page of LUGNET vs. the News page change for spotlights as well? I noticed this last night, and right now I'm seeing: Main Page: 1. LUGNET Posting Policy Update 2. LEGO-decorated Christmas Tree 3. Bullfrog: My (...) (22 years ago, 28-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Change my FLAG, please!
|
|
Dear LUGNET Transition Team (or the person in charge of flags around here), I recently moved from Georgia to Vrginia and the Flag under my membership account has not changed. How does one change this? Also, the current flag present is the old (...) (22 years ago, 28-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Posting Policy Update
|
|
(...) Sure, np - I wasn't trying to second-guess, just to guess what it was actually set to, since news-by-mail doesn't reflect that, and I wasn't feeling adventerous enough to look up the msg itself on the server. (...) Right, the process seems ok, (...) (22 years ago, 28-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Posting Policy Update
|
|
(...) Kelly set .terms on purpose, by the precedent that Suz set when she announced ((URL) the "New Policy on Bickering in LUGNET Newsgroups", not by mistake. I've reset the FUT there to keep things together (there is already another followup there) (...) (22 years ago, 28-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Posting Policy Update
|
|
(I'm trying to guess where the FUT was supposed to be - .admin.general?) (...) I think this is a good idea (not just the accoutnability, but the whole suspension bit). But I'm trying to understand the technical details - when someone is suspended, (...) (22 years ago, 28-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | LUGNET Posting Policy Update
|
|
LUGNET administration has always had the ability to temporarily or permanently suspend the posting privileges of a user or member. In the past this has been only very rarely used. The mechanism for doing so was such that only Todd (or for a time, (...) (22 years ago, 28-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms, lugnet.announce, lugnet.general, FTX) !!
|
| |
| | Re: New spotlight weights( was Re: LDraw shortcut images in FTX
|
|
(...) Well, yeah. (...) To be honest, I don't think there should be one either, but essentially that's what the system is doing right now anyway. Whoever decided that "all posts to .lego should be -1" and "all posts to .color should be -2" clearly (...) (22 years ago, 27-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New spotlight weights
|
|
(...) I think I agree. (...) I'm not sure I like this idea - here we are all AFOLs, I see no reason to treat official TLC announcements any different. If we get the rankings right, there should be no need. (...) I would be fairly strongly against (...) (22 years ago, 27-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New spotlight weights( was Re: LDraw shortcut images in FTX
|
|
(...) The weights today are global, there is no facility for an admin to adjust weights on a post other than by voting him or herself (or not voting). Nor do I think there should be one. I honestly enjoy some of the debating and whatnot too, but you (...) (22 years ago, 27-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New spotlight weights( was Re: LDraw shortcut images in FTX
|
|
(...) Huh! So-- if Jake made an announcement about, say, new bulk pack sets in "klassik grey" (or if new colors were switched back to old) and posted to .announce, .color, and .lego, the net result would be a -1 default? I think I like all of the (...) (22 years ago, 27-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | New spotlight weights( was Re: LDraw shortcut images in FTX
|
|
(...) There will no doubt be a formal announcement for this, well, maybe this is it. Here are what I think the current weights are: [ ".announce" => 2 ], [ ".moc" => 3 ], # Net effect +5 [ ".admin" => -1 ], [ ".off-topic" => -1 ], [ ".debate" => -4 (...) (22 years ago, 27-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw shortcut images in FTX
|
|
(...) I believe (as ROSCO mentinoed) that these FTX shortcuts use the Partsref pictures, which have not been updated at least for a 2-3 years, and afaik, there is currently no plan to continue updateing them. (...) Interesting. Cool even! That would (...) (22 years ago, 27-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New Newsgroup Please
|
|
(...) OK, just to confirm, you've been using lugnet.robotics for this (not lugnet.robotics.rcx)? I guess what's maybe not generally known is that lugnet.robotics.rcx is actually a newsgroup and not just a hierarchy. Its charter specifically includes (...) (22 years ago, 26-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw shortcut images in FTX
|
|
(...) I believe the LDrawPart macro uses images from the Lugnet parts reference, which isn't always up-to-date with the latest official library. Solution is to either get it up to date, or change the macro to use the images from ldraw.org. ROSCO (22 years ago, 26-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | LDraw shortcut images in FTX
|
|
why does this (the shortcut for a skeleton) work: [LDrawPart 6260c01:15] [LDrawPart 6260c01:15] but this(the shortcut for the train wheel holder, wheels and axle completel assembly) doesn't: [LDrawPart 2878c01:0] [LDrawPart 2878c01:0] nor does this (...) (22 years ago, 26-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New Newsgroup Please
|
|
(...) I've sent a note to the rest of the transition team for their awareness. Speaking personally, it seems a reasonable request. lugnet.robotics.firmware? lugnet.robotics.rcx.firmware? The former is more general in case other firmwares are (...) (22 years ago, 26-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | New Newsgroup Please
|
|
I'd like to create a new robotics newsgroup for the new RCX replacement firmware. if you agree, can you make this happen please? Right now, I've been posting on lugnet.robotics but I've had some feedback about the messages being too long. Apparently (...) (22 years ago, 26-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Help! New Membership
|
|
(...) Michael, Virginia -- Hi, Thank-yous to me are not in order, given the delay that I made you suffer though. But you're welcome. Thanks for your incredible patience. --Todd (22 years ago, 22-Dec-04, to lugnet.people.newbie, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Help! New Membership
|
|
Todd - Just wanted to drop in my thanks, as I see that I and a whole bunch of other people who have been waiting on their membership were activated in the past 24 hours. :) - Michael (22 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.people.newbie, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Spotlight statistics
|
|
(...) I think it's been here for quite a while. Ever since Todd redid how article ranking worked, I think. I use it all the time to try to figure out how popular certain articles are (as in, "why is THIS article at the top of the pile right now?" (...) (22 years ago, 18-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Spotlight statistics
|
|
Is this a new feature? (example (URL) ) I suspect not but it is interesting. Tim (22 years ago, 18-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Help! New Membership
|
|
Well, at least I'm not alone... lol. Thanks, Todd, I'm awaiting my number (somewhat) patiently. :-) (22 years ago, 15-Dec-04, to lugnet.people.newbie, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Help! New Membership
|
|
(...) Todd, There is another new member who has paid but hasn't received activation yet: Robert Leahey - robert@leahey.com - member 064-971 He has been waiting for 2-3 months now... Please help him. Thanks, Eric (22 years ago, 15-Dec-04, to lugnet.people.newbie, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Changing the flag?
|
|
Hi, when I subscribed I lived in France, so I have a French flag next to my name. Now I'm in Germany and would like to change that, but it seems that I can't. I guess that normally I would get a german flag, but can I have an EU flag? Jürgen PS: (...) (22 years ago, 15-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Help! New Membership
|
|
Todd - I've got the same problem. Membership form and Paypal submitted 26 Nov. No movement since then. Thanks. - Michael Zecca (22 years ago, 15-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Help! New Membership
|
|
(...) My apologies, Virginia -- I'll get you set up. --Todd (22 years ago, 14-Dec-04, to lugnet.people.newbie, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Help! New Membership
|
|
I signed up for a LUGNET Membership on 11/25. I received the email from the LUGNET Membership server stating that my membership had been accepted. I sent a PayPal payment to the address requested, after which I received an email stating that SpamDam (...) (22 years ago, 14-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.people.newbie)
|
| |
| | Re: Shop@Home Nightmare! (from a now ex-AFOL)
|
|
(...) Jamie, if you have all that time, could you please post some of your creations. If you have already, could you please post a link to them so I can see them. I hope you get well soon, and that you begin to realize that there are people in the (...) (22 years ago, 13-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: Mini Set Availablity
|
|
(...) ACK! I can't believe I did that! D'OH!! Well, I'm back to normal posting id now, heh. -Lenny (22 years ago, 10-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET server response code 0
|
|
(...) I don't know WHY but I do see this a fair bit. Often just before the server goes into "server under heavy load, try again later" mode. When it happens to me, rather than refreshing (and possibly losing my words of wisdom unless I copied them (...) (22 years ago, 7-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | LUGNET server response code 0
|
|
When I post replies (by web interface) I often find that the LUGNET server will continually send 0 as a response until I restart my browser, or refresh the original post's page - and then, with some luck it will accept the post. I certainly don't (...) (22 years ago, 7-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Cool Lego Site of the Week
|
|
Hey all! Are there any plans in the very near future to start up the CLSotW? I know it went by the wayside for a while and was supposed to start up again. What's the word? (22 years ago, 4-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: Spammer Using LUGNET?
|
|
"Janey Cook" <janeyofthejungle@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:I84M6E.4AI@lugnet.com... (...) Janey, I know it will be expensive for you to do so, but I would strongly recommend you upgrade your antivirus program to something that is the latest (...) (22 years ago, 3-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Spammer Using LUGNET?
|
|
(...) Looks like some spammer or script kiddie (or worm) figured out that LUGNET is a good domain to spoof return addresses from. It is very very unlikely (although not impossible, I suppose, but it would have to be something that works on Linux) (...) (22 years ago, 3-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Spammer Using LUGNET?
|
|
(...) From I Wed Dec 1 00:19:32 2004 X-Apparently-To: janeyofthejungle@yah...SPAM0).com via 206.190.38.187; Wed, 01 Dec 2004 00:23:21 -0800 X-YahooFilteredBulk: 202.88.182.35 X-Originating-IP: [202.88.182.35] Return-Path: <i6w8e7.1c0p@lugnet.com> (...) (22 years ago, 3-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: Spammer Using LUGNET?
|
|
(...) 6 days ago I cleared my "spam" folder, and today there is a total of 9 pieces of spam, and 6 of them (one from each day) is this same user with the lugnet.com address, each mail has a different subject, and the attachment is slightly different (...) (22 years ago, 3-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: I love Lego
|
|
!Wow, God, all the people who replied to this post are so defensive and protective of TLG. This is simply a personally statement of an individual who's valid concerns has caused him to express his feelings to TLG. This is directed to them...not you, (...) (22 years ago, 26-Nov-04, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.announce, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.people, lugnet.general) !
|
| |
| | Re: Spammer Using LUGNET?
|
|
(...) Yes, I am getting them as well, I get one a day with that lugnet.com addy, always with an attachment which I just assumed is a virus, so I have just deleted them. Janey "Red Brick" (22 years ago, 25-Nov-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Spammer Using LUGNET?
|
|
Has anyone else received an email with this address? I5zJ6s.rDJ@lugnet.com I got my fifth such email and all five have had some virus or worm in them. Thanks, Adr. (22 years ago, 23-Nov-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Ten cheers for Jake
|
|
(...) Yes, but LUGNET admins do not cancel user's posts without the direct consent of the User. This is stated policy as contained in the ToS - which you, as a User, should have read and understood. The User who used the "f-word" over twenty times (...) (22 years ago, 21-Nov-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Ten cheers for Jake
|
|
Hello! (...) The issue is not the F-word itself in my as always more than humble opinion. It is just one syllable composed of three phonemes (the sounds /f/, /A/ and /k/) when you speak it out loud, using four graphemes (the letters 'f', 'u', 'c' (...) (22 years ago, 21-Nov-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Ten cheers for Jake
|
|
(...) LUGNET has admins? I haven't ever seen evidence of that...I seem to remember a particular thread that had the F word in it over twenty times and it was never edited or deleted. 'The friendliest place on the Internet', eh? (22 years ago, 20-Nov-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Password, need reset.
|
|
Hi! It seems I've misplaced my e-mail with the password for my LUGNET-account #1793. I'd like to have a new password sent (or the old one, does not matter). Luckily I'm still logged on in one browser :) Thanks in advance and sorry about the (...) (22 years ago, 15-Nov-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Password help
|
|
(...) Not a bad idea, but a more automated solution for reset is being considered instead. --Todd (22 years ago, 14-Nov-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: BrickLink set inventories -> LUGNET ?
|
|
(...) * bumping this up for visibility, since no one replied * Anyone know what happened here ? Ray (22 years ago, 13-Nov-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Password help
|
|
(...) Hi Chris, Sorry about that -- I missed your mail. I see it in my inbox now. I'll ask the server to reset your password -- you should be all set in about 5 minutes. --Todd (22 years ago, 10-Nov-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Password help
|
|
(...) Who did you email? Todd's currently the only person who can do this. (although changing that is my most desired enhancement request at the moment!) (...) If you emailed Todd, you did the right thing. (22 years ago, 10-Nov-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Password help
|
|
I need to get my password reset. I've e-mailed about this, but got no response. What is the procedure for this? Chris Yoder Member 1595 (22 years ago, 10-Nov-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Can we help?
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Richie Dulin wrote: (snip) I am not going to play second-guessing games with you, Richie. The points that needed to be made have been made. You can heed them or not, as you like, but you can no longer plead ignorance if you (...) (22 years ago, 9-Nov-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Can we help?
|
|
(...) Then why did you not comment on it (or any other part of the post which was, in your view mocking) in your response? Why didn’t you point out that *that* post was mocking and that I should not do it? And if that was only ‘part of the mocking’ (...) (22 years ago, 9-Nov-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: duplicate post
|
|
(...) Ask an admin via email to have it cancelled. Please include the (web interface) URL of the post in question that needs cancellation in your note. You must be the author of the post and your note should make that easily verifiable for best (...) (22 years ago, 8-Nov-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.faq, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Can we help?
|
|
(...) It is part of the mocking in that post, yes. (...) I don't view it that way. Not all sarcasm is mocking. (...) I don't feel the original FUT was wrong. Admonitions (which my post was, although poorly structured) belong in the original group (...) (22 years ago, 7-Nov-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Can we help?
|
|
(...) -snip- (...) But you said in (URL) that sarcasm didn't really have a place. (...) Noted. (...) Do you consider the part where I used almost your exact words in response to your post the part which is mocking? If so, how was your post not a (...) (22 years ago, 7-Nov-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | BrickLink set inventories -> LUGNET ?
|
|
I know I remember seeing BrickLink set inventories being posted to Database / Set Inventories in the past, but I don't see any being posted there for quite a while. In fact, the last one that I see is dated 11-Apr-03. Is something broken or did this (...) (22 years ago, 7-Nov-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Can we help?
|
|
What follows are my personal views, not official statements of position but I'm willing to wager that they are close enough as not to make much of a difference. (...) This post by you: (URL) was not, in my view, "mocking someone", nor did I say it (...) (22 years ago, 5-Nov-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: SPAM and OT messages
|
|
<Snip> (...) </Snip> Mr. S, Thank you for your insightful and thoughtful post. As far as I can tell, the only person who is overreacting here is you. As you can very well read, you may have noticed that I did, infact, forward these concerns to the (...) (22 years ago, 3-Nov-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Can we help?
|
|
(...) You see it as a mock of someone. I see it as a mock of an outrageous claim. (...) Mocks of some people are acceptable, though perhaps not appropriate, outside the administrative area. (...) And yet, Larry, you mocked me... -snip- (...) One (...) (22 years ago, 2-Nov-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Can we help?
|
|
(...) Possibly. But by no means necessarily. In my view, sometimes the way a point is made contributes to the understanding of the point being made. (...) But your condescending reprimand to me contained both sarcasm and mockery, right? And I note (...) (22 years ago, 2-Nov-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
