Subject:
|
Re: Can we help?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 9 Nov 2004 01:20:59 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
362 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Richie Dulin wrote:
>
> > Do you consider the part where I used almost your exact words in response to
> > your post the part which is mocking?
>
> It is part of the mocking in that post, yes.
Then why did you not comment on it (or any other part of the post which was, in
your view mocking) in your response? Why didn’t you point out that *that* post
was mocking and that I should not do it?
And if that was only ‘part of the mocking’ where was the rest?
The 'non-sarcastic' translation of my post?
The post script regarding the place of sarcasm, mockery and truth?
The fact that I didn’t use your words exactly, but corrected them?
-snip-
> Admonitions (which my post was,
> although poorly structured) belong in the original group (or, better, privately
> via email, but I note that you ignored my email the last time that you were
> mocking and I noticed it, so I didn't try that first as it had a record of
> failing) unless there is a meta question as to their validity.
You make the erroneous claim that I ignored your email. On what basis do you
claim that? At best, you can claim that I failed to respond to you. I have not
ignored any email from you.
And I may well have failed to respond - because I don’t recall such an email
(and I have a pretty good memory) and I’ve been through my email log and
haven’t found an admonishment for ‘mocking’ from you.
When was it? What perceived ‘mocking’ did it admonish me for?
Cheers
Richie Dulin
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Can we help?
|
| In lugnet.admin.general, Richie Dulin wrote: (snip) I am not going to play second-guessing games with you, Richie. The points that needed to be made have been made. You can heed them or not, as you like, but you can no longer plead ignorance if you (...) (20 years ago, 9-Nov-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Can we help?
|
| (...) It is part of the mocking in that post, yes. (...) I don't view it that way. Not all sarcasm is mocking. (...) I don't feel the original FUT was wrong. Admonitions (which my post was, although poorly structured) belong in the original group (...) (20 years ago, 7-Nov-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
16 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
