Subject:
|
Re: Can we help?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 2 Nov 2004 11:47:04 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
345 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.dear-lego, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
| |
In lugnet.dear-lego, Richie Dulin wrote:
| |
Sure is: Outrageous claim. Unrelated evidence.
|
It would have been clearer to just say that instead of being clever.
| |
I see now that the poster has clarified his statement. It is now just an
outrageous claim.
|
So he has.
| |
PS: I thought that sarcasm, mockery and truth (and even all degrees of
subtlety) had a place in lugnet discussions. Perhaps this is no longer the
case?
|
Sarcasm and mockery? Not really, no.
Your FUT cancelled (it’s way off topic for .general) and FUT reset to
admin.general
|
The force-FUT power of admins was a really bad idea.
LUGNET is about posting what you want where you want (within reason). If I
wanted a place where a bunch of admins told me where I could post and what was
“on-topic”, I would post at FBTB or
C-C.com. How long until the LUGNET admins
start locking threads?
Marc Nelson Jr.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Can we help?
|
| (...) No, I believe that if you review the ToS you will find that it is not at all about "posting what you want when you want". One of the great virtues of LUGNET, in at least this reader's view, is the compartmentalization it fosters. (20 years ago, 2-Nov-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
16 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
