To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 12009
12008  |  12010
Subject: 
Re: LDraw shortcut images in FTX
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Sun, 26 Dec 2004 21:38:26 GMT
Viewed: 
700 times
  
In lugnet.admin.general, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
   why does this (the shortcut for a skeleton) work:



<<LDrawPart(6260c01:15)>>

but this(the shortcut for the train wheel holder, wheels and axle completel assembly) doesn’t:



<<LDrawPart(2878c01:0)>>

nor does this (the shortcut for 2 wheels and an axle, used in the above):



<<LDrawPart(2879c01:0)>>

Is it some sort of unreasonable prejudice against .train people(1)? Or is it merely the much less sinister explanation that the images need regeneration, as these subassemblies are relatively recent? Or something else? Does it matter that one of the shortcuts is nested 2 deep?

I believe the LDrawPart macro uses images from the Lugnet parts reference, which isn’t always up-to-date with the latest official library. Solution is to either get it up to date, or change the macro to use the images from ldraw.org.

ROSCO



Message is in Reply To:
  LDraw shortcut images in FTX
 
why does this (the shortcut for a skeleton) work: [LDrawPart 6260c01:15] [LDrawPart 6260c01:15] but this(the shortcut for the train wheel holder, wheels and axle completel assembly) doesn't: [LDrawPart 2878c01:0] [LDrawPart 2878c01:0] nor does this (...) (20 years ago, 26-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)

30 Messages in This Thread:









Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR