 | | Re: Project Y Coloured Blocks
|
|
(...) I have light gray, black, yellow--all 10 times I also have yellow with the eyes... so those are the ones I'll probably end up using 'cause i don'T think anyone else is doing that. (...) I agree... but rulz is rulz... I'm good to go Dave K (19 years ago, 26-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: RC motors with an RCX
|
|
(...) nope. JB stuff is "Verboten." NOW, if a case of HItechinc parts were to cross my desk, say enuff to hand out to all members for upcoming games, MAYBE, just MAYBE, i could discuss with the "high council" about allowing non-lego products. ;) (...) (19 years ago, 26-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: RC motors with an RCX
|
|
(...) Now you know why I had to build a 5A power booster. Of course, you're not allowed to use one ;) JB (19 years ago, 26-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | RC motors with an RCX
|
|
Ya know.... when they say you cant run an RC motor with an RCX.... they mean it. it dont work. RCX gets all "mad" I had to pour milk in mine to make it happy. Chris (19 years ago, 25-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Project Y Coloured Blocks
|
|
Just so there is no worry about game blocks, I'm going to bring a full set of standard game blocks in 10 different colours. That way if there are any concerns or conflicts they can be resolved by using this base set. I believe it is possible to make (...) (19 years ago, 25-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Question for builders
|
|
(...) Greatly appreciated Janey, but if you wont be able to make it don't worry about it, I put together a set from different colour plates so I'll have a backup set. Vitali (19 years ago, 25-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Question for builders
|
|
(...) How's everyone else? Ummm lets just say... if I had a nickel for every bot I have built that worked at home, I would be a poor woman.... and in this case if I had a nickel for every bot I built that doesn't work... I still would be broke. (...) (19 years ago, 25-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Question for builders
|
|
(...) I hate Lego spacing. That and rounded beams. Thank you. Calum (19 years ago, 25-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Question for builders
|
|
(...) I LOVE the tank treads. MANY of my unsuccessful robots use them for the Rx games. If I recall, the bot that was more or less KING of the Hill had 3 PAIRS of tank treads. I mean, look at this GREAT pic of me, holding my WINNING robot entry. (...) (19 years ago, 25-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Question for builders
|
|
(...) I don't particularly like the treads, because they don't run as smoothly, so I don't use them much. I tried my robot with the synchro drive and its not working out for me either, so i think I'm gonna try out the adder/subtractor drive system (...) (19 years ago, 24-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: One more rule verification
|
|
(...) Okay, if you split in two, then your total score should the same as if you stayed as one. Fine by me. As long as we don't add the two together as if you had two separate robots and got to keep the sum of two unique machines. (...) I'm okay (...) (19 years ago, 24-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: One more rule verification
|
|
(...) I thought of that, but also considered that there will be many different ideas for this competition--one of them is the shell/ROV. One is the Calum'Bot which doesn't move (much). One idea was a completely contained 'bot with everything on (...) (19 years ago, 24-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: One more rule verification
|
|
(...) I think it should be scored as if it's one robot, which I believe is what you're saying. I'm not a fan of the idea of leaving a motionless shell behind. If we all did that there would be no space left to move on the field. (...) According to (...) (19 years ago, 24-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Question for builders
|
|
(...) My experiences with tracks were short lived...before I could get to the issue of lots of weight, I couldn't even get past the turn part--I found they weren't really accurate. Victor and I had tried one early on the "kBot" marble robots. It (...) (19 years ago, 24-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Question for builders
|
|
How are people's experience with those rubber tracks that come with Mindstorms kits? Can they handle alot of weight and still turn? I've seen them used in early 'obt competitons, but haven't seen much of them lately. I made a quicl little track (...) (19 years ago, 24-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Has anyone seen Exo-Force 7706 Mobile Defense Tank in any store?
|
|
(...) Pop by tonight Dave and I can set you up with your track :) (19 years ago, 23-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Has anyone seen Exo-Force 7706 Mobile Defense Tank in any store?
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Jeff Van Winden wrote: <snip> (...) Well thats not good--i wanted to use the tank treads inthe competitoin next weekend!! Grr!! Thanks Jeff! Dave K (19 years ago, 23-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Has anyone seen Exo-Force 7706 Mobile Defense Tank in any store?
|
|
August is the date to expect stock for this item, and tons of other new stuff. (19 years ago, 23-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Has anyone seen Exo-Force 7706 Mobile Defense Tank in any store?
|
|
(...) I don't think that it is slated for release until later this year... Jeff VW (19 years ago, 23-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Has anyone seen Exo-Force 7706 Mobile Defense Tank in any store?
|
|
I was at hte Oakville TRU and they had every other set in multiple copies, but no 7706. It was also interesting to see the MegaBlok rep there with the TRU guy talking about product that wasn't moving... I still shook his hand, however--having (...) (19 years ago, 23-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Library and the possible strike...
|
|
(...) Caught on the news this morning that the stike/job action has been averted...sorry to fear monger :) -Rob A> (19 years ago, 23-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Library and the possible strike...
|
|
(...) I have spoken to the Library and was told they will remain open. Our booking for the space will be honoured and the activity room will be available. Phew. Thanks the reminder Rob! Calum (19 years ago, 23-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Library and the possible strike...
|
|
(...) Hey Rob, Thanks for the heads up--this is what happens when your TV diet is nothing but the Olympics and Pinks on Speed Network--you miss real news :) (URL) will contact the library tomorrow to ask if it will be open. I will also try and (...) (19 years ago, 23-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Google and rtlToronto
|
|
I just notices that if you (URL) google for rtlToronto> my site/blog is the 5th hit. Weird, eh? -Rob A> (19 years ago, 23-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, FTX)
|
| |
| | Library and the possible strike...
|
|
I know Prokect Y it is still a number of days away but... I was talking to a friend who thought that the TPL was staffed by CUPE. Do we need to consider an alternate venue in case they are (still) on strike (in which case the library would close)? (...) (19 years ago, 23-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: One more rule verification
|
|
(...) I would agree with that scoring. And I want to see your rover climb out of a (min) 5" high shell :) So go for it! I do wonder about the definition of "in" though. If you have a stationary outer shell shaped like an open 'U' with three openings (...) (19 years ago, 23-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: One more rule verification
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Calum Tsang wrote: <snip> (...) This is a pure hypothetical--I'm not saying I'm doing this or not... If there's this outside shell that has 6-8 transfer openings and there's this robot inside that comes out when we press (...) (19 years ago, 23-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: One more rule verification
|
|
(...) cough... Hassenplug.... cough. Antonishen cough... :) Chris (19 years ago, 23-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: One more rule verification
|
|
(...) I think that by leaving this option open many will build one part that goes around and dispense the blocks and the second part which can just stand in one spot and have many transfer openings. If everyone agrees to it then I'm fine with it (...) (19 years ago, 22-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: One more rule verification
|
|
(...) Well, I want to hear what others (eg Derek, RobA, Iain, Vitali) have to say, as they are more important than my opinion...but... I would take the block count inbound of the two as the greater of the two. So if Part A gets 5 unique blocks and (...) (19 years ago, 22-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Yet another blog, and video, and build, and... whatever...
|
|
(...) That's the exact configuration I had, down to the axle joiners :) Problem is, the spacing is too far--it doesn't grip the brick. It's like as if it needs an extra millimeter of diameter on each wheel. I might 'cheat' and put some rubber bands (...) (19 years ago, 22-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | One more rule verification
|
|
If I have two 'bots that start in 1x1x1 cu ft, and both have transfer openings, and at the word 'start', these two 'bots separate and go about their business... At the end of 3-5 minutes, do blocks in each 'bot count together, or separate? Dave K (19 years ago, 22-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Yet another blog, and video, and build, and... whatever...
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Calum Tsang wrote: <snip> (...) thanks! (...) If I recall correctly (and everyone knows that my memory is oft faulty)... Wheel-- (URL) axle extenders on technic motors, put 2L axle in the extenders, attach the wheels and (...) (19 years ago, 22-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Yet another blog, and video, and build, and... whatever...
|
|
(...) I enjoy these blogs, btw. I've been trying to build a block cannon and one of the problems was getting the blocks to slide down the channel properly. I will set up a blog page for mine tonight. Has anyone figured out a good spacing and choice (...) (19 years ago, 22-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Yet another blog, and video, and build, and... whatever...
|
|
(URL) which I go on about my latest build--it's together and all the parts work separately, but, as noted in the blog, when put all together, there were a few issues. That didn't stop me from making a blog about it... And since block transfer videos (...) (19 years ago, 22-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: one more video
|
|
(...) Sounds pretty fool proof, looks very impressive how you don't need a motor or anything. Vitali (19 years ago, 22-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: one more video
|
|
(...) i made the "handle" part wider then a T.O. width; so that only something to the "right" of the block depositor will have a flat enuff surface to "depress" the block, ~THEN~ I made the depositor part "off set" so that it has to be in a T.O. (...) (19 years ago, 22-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: one more video
|
|
(...) What would happen if the handle is pressed by accident by some robot or the wall when its not lined up with a block transfer interface? Vitali (19 years ago, 21-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | March 4th side competition
|
|
I'm having so much fun building (and rebuilding and rebuilding) the 'bot for Project 'Y' that I'll probably have no time to build an entry for any side competition. As well, I'll be focused on the primary competition, so this is a round-about way of (...) (19 years ago, 21-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Few more questions
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Derek Raycraft wrote: <snip> (...) Your blocks are uniquely coloured compared to the other player's blocks And if you build a robot that can transfer a block into your own robot, does it count? Calum's 'bot is going (...) (19 years ago, 20-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Few more questions
|
|
(...) I worked a little more on my cannon this weekend, shrinking its horazontal size significantly. Also increased it's power. I've also build my adder subtractor base. I'm just not sure I'm going to have time to complete it by contest time. (...) (...) (19 years ago, 20-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Sometimes I feel out of touch...
|
|
(...) I had the same experience recently at Bricks and Blocks. I walk in and there's a whole new series of X-Pods in new outer packaging. I didn't know about either... and X-Pods are one of my favorite product lines. :) If you haven't seen them yet, (...) (19 years ago, 20-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Few more questions
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, David Koudys wrote: Some good questions... (...) So far I read: Definites? Chris Dave RobA Maybes? Me (hopefully) Wayne? (he's built a cannon) Derek? (he's built a cannon and a sensor thing) Vitali? (he's posted many (...) (19 years ago, 20-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: event driven vs. timing driven code...
|
|
(...) You know, I'm man enough to eat my words from before...I am looking forward to this too. I spent a lot of the weekend working on my "you come to me, I'm lazy" robot. Prompted primarily by my friend Sacha, who wrote all the software for it. (...) (19 years ago, 20-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, FTX)
|
| |
| | Few more questions
|
|
How many robots are coming? I'm asking because if I build a hopper to old 10 blocks, the hopper scratches the 1 foot high mark on my 'bot. Sure I could make it more complicated, but... ;) A more important question, however, is the scoring.. If half (...) (19 years ago, 20-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Sometimes I feel out of touch...
|
|
(...) The stors I visit have tons of Knights Kindom/Bionicle/Dino, a few tubs but very little else. Sometimes an exo-force, but I'm thinking what all this is telling me is that I should take more trips to cookstown Dave K (19 years ago, 20-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: event driven vs. timing driven code...
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Rob Antonishen wrote: <snip> (...) That's a beautiful vid! I think this is gonna be a great competition... (19 years ago, 20-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: my test platform.
|
|
(...) <snip> I must not have the right codec--all I get is the sound--no vid Eh, I'll try updating... Dave K (19 years ago, 20-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Sometimes I feel out of touch...
|
|
I was at the Wal last night and found a new set called the 8283 Telehandler, a cool looking fork truck. I can't believe I didn't know about this cool set. I suspect I've been missing out on all the cool sets the past five years because I never see (...) (19 years ago, 20-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Cybermaster Touch questions
|
|
(...) My CM sensors are really screwed up, they don't read consistently. I suspect my batch were manufactured incorrectly. Calum (19 years ago, 20-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Cybermaster Touch questions
|
|
Has anyone had "erratic" reading when multiplexing Cybermaster sensors? I am finding that with the SAME 3 sensors on the same wire, will change in "value" when I use different RCXen. THEN, when I put them back to the original RCX I get different (...) (19 years ago, 20-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: event driven vs. timing driven code...
|
|
(...) Yep Chris - it is a basic line follower type routine, with the only sneaky thing being that it always looks for the light staying the same or getting brighter (as it gets closer). If it looses the light in its FOV then it will reset an go back (...) (19 years ago, 20-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | one more video
|
|
This is a quick 1.5 meg avi video of the Bock transfer device. ZERO motors, 3 moving parts. 1 human hand for the test. (URL) (19 years ago, 20-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | my test platform.
|
|
Short video of my seeking. (URL) (1) (its 4.5 meg - taken with a cheap labview web cam. ) right now, I have a few things I need to over come. 1. Work on "squaring" up when bot finds T.O. on an angle. 2. make unit faster by getting rid of worm/24 (...) (19 years ago, 19-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: event driven vs. timing driven code...
|
|
Rob Antonishen wrote: ing the state. Works OK, but you can still (...) COOL!!!! i might just have to do a short video myself. it would seem that the "spin" idea works well. Rob, do you have other code that keeps it looking for the light after your (...) (19 years ago, 19-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: event driven vs. timing driven code...
|
|
(...) When using events I tend to use a state model, and use the events to switch the state. So my main loop is: repeat forever if state 1 do stuff if state 2 do stuff if state 3 do stuff and then have eternal tasks defining the state. Works OK, but (...) (19 years ago, 19-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: event driven vs. timing driven code...
|
|
(...) Welcome to MY world! thats how I have programed MOST of my bots, and THATS the number one thing that bites me in the A..... arm. you just CANT think of all the scenarios. This is going to be a GREAT game. (...) i am so impressed with your seek (...) (19 years ago, 18-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | event driven vs. timing driven code...
|
|
K, most of my codeing for every competition has been based mostly on timing--sure I had a few events, such as touch sensors and light sensors and such, but when touch sensors were pressed, the code was to back up for x seconds, rotate for x seconds, (...) (19 years ago, 17-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto20 Poster Available
|
|
(...) Can't he just put them up at home? Steve ps very nice picture. (19 years ago, 17-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto20 Poster Available
|
|
(...) They're up at my office and already people are talking about it. So your work is appreciated... Dave K (19 years ago, 17-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto20 Poster Available
|
|
(...) give people an idea of what they'll see. I hope there's some of these posters up at RobA's office... Calum (19 years ago, 17-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Project Y playfield and your robot
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Vitali Furman wrote: <snip> (...) I was actually thinking of painting hte side walls tremclad grey before the competition, but it's nasty weather outside and I don't feel like painting inside when I can't open windows... (...) (19 years ago, 17-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | The continuing Bloggy saga
|
|
(URL) which I got the 'bot to work with bumpers There's a little movie, too... K, maybe I'm taking this blogging thing too far... Nyaah! Dave K (19 years ago, 17-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Project Y playfield and your robot
|
|
(...) Well I have nothing against increasing the height of the wall, I'm actually for it. It will probably help the game out a little more, I can already imagine how it will go, a whole bunch of little robots going haywire without any of the (...) (19 years ago, 16-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Project Y playfield and your robot
|
|
(...) I'm not sure I want to inconvenience you to increase the height of the walls...we already spec'd the height...so builders should have realized the environment will have background noise and dealt with it appropriately. For those building (...) (19 years ago, 15-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Project Y playfield and your robot
|
|
Just wanted to give everyone a 'heads up'... I was testing my 'bot in my mini-playfield and I noticed something-- The height of the light to designate the transfer openings is higher than the playfield walls. Since my light sensor array is set up to (...) (19 years ago, 15-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Starting over...
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Chris Magno wrote: <snip> (...) (URL) the code thus far--hopefully it's self explanatory Dave K (19 years ago, 15-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Starting over...
|
|
(...) WOW. hey mister. thats some nice code. Chris (19 years ago, 14-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Starting over...
|
|
(...) now why did I say the 12th... it's nobody's b-day (that I know)... it's not even a holiday dunno... I'll be there on the 4th with 'Design Team Runamok 'bot' (19 years ago, 14-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Starting over...
|
|
(...) You mean the 4th, right? Calum (19 years ago, 14-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Starting over...
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Calum Tsang wrote: <snip> (...) I have no idea if I'll get it done before the 12th, what with the busy hectic lifestyle of mine... But I'll bring somehting... Dave K (19 years ago, 14-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Starting over...
|
|
(...) Very cool and inspirational too, Dave. I am rather impressed by the amount of work both you and Chris (and presumably others) are doing. Calum (19 years ago, 14-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Starting over...
|
|
So here's the latest rendition of my rtl20 'bot-- (URL) are scant few pics at this time, but I'l lget more up later. The synchro-bot is no more... There's a 25 meg video showing the 'bot looking for and finding the light. It's a good second effort! (...) (19 years ago, 14-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | [rtlToronto] rtlToronto20 Poster Available
|
|
Hey folks, Due to unparalleled demand (okay, who am I kidding) there's now a poster for rtl20: (URL) it and print a copy to help us advertise the event on March 4. Bring your friends and family! Calum PS-You can enjoy a boring "Making of the rtl20 (...) (19 years ago, 12-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: that transformer robot.
|
|
(...) Look similar to those made by Kondo Robotics (URL) is their english site. Download the hardware pdf and take a a look at it. Lots of servos. Wonder what they cost? Here is a movie of one of the Kondo robots dancing: (URL) A> (19 years ago, 12-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Cybermaster Touch Sensors -
|
|
(...) Yes. My Connect Four robot used 5 cybermaster touch sensors, and one normal sensor all connected in series to one port. But, I wasn't trying to figure out WHICH sensors were pressed, just how many. Generally, in series or parallel, the reading (...) (19 years ago, 12-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Cybermaster Touch Sensors -
|
|
(...) Never having used these sensors, is it possible to use four (three CM, one regular) on one port? Calum (19 years ago, 12-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Cybermaster Touch Sensors -
|
|
(...) YEP, that did the trick. thanks Ross. Chris ps. it did take me a few min to "work out" i needed to load the pic and photoshop the gama to a point I could grok it. ;) (19 years ago, 12-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Cybermaster Touch Sensors -
|
|
(...) Try this (yeah I know they're not cybermaster, and yeah I know it's hard to see in black, but I'm sure you can work it out): (URL) believe that will get you 2 in series, then you just have to calibrate the right values. ROSCO (19 years ago, 12-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: that transformer robot.
|
|
(...) Hey, watch it. When the Yellow Revolution comes... :) Calum (19 years ago, 12-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Spring Toy, Train and Doll Show May 7, 2006
|
|
(...) Word. I'll even bring forks. Calum (19 years ago, 12-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.loc.ca, lugnet.loc.ca.on.tor, FTX)
|
| |
| | Cybermaster Touch Sensors -
|
|
I have used this GREAT page in the past for info on how to hook up 3 Cybermaster Touch Sensors to one RCX port. (URL) uses the "magic" of wiring Lego electric wires and overlapping, and other things to convert the wires from parallel to series. I (...) (19 years ago, 12-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | that transformer robot.
|
|
I just saw this cool link.... um, err. I mean, check out the cool robot I made. take note that it is 100% made from lego, and that the voice in the back ground is calum. (URL) 100% made by me and narrated by calum. Chris (19 years ago, 12-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: OT - JLUG
|
|
(...) And it appears to be back in business now. ROSCO (19 years ago, 11-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: OT - JLUG
|
|
(...) (URL) I posted something similar in the forum, I guess you don't visit enough????? ;) ROSCO (19 years ago, 11-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: OT - JLUG
|
|
(...) I'm guessing jlug is hosted by Northstar? They are migrating servers to a new data centre today. J (19 years ago, 11-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: OT - JLUG
|
|
(...) No clue. It disappeared around 4-5 hours ago I think. Don't think it's much cause for concern though.... I mean it's JLUG! Who wants to read 10 page-long threads with nothing but your posts in them anyways.... Legoswami (19 years ago, 11-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | OT - JLUG
|
|
YES, this is OT, Anyone know what happend to JLUG? i cant seem to log in? I only ask cause most people on LUGNET read JLUG. ;) Chris (19 years ago, 11-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Spring Toy, Train and Doll Show May 7, 2006
|
|
(...) i'll be there! calum, start baking that pie! i'll bring plates this time. -§ deborah §- (19 years ago, 11-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.loc.ca, lugnet.loc.ca.on.tor, FTX)
|
| |
| | Sick...and Tired...
|
|
Sorry - Couldn't make it to dinner :( I am sick like a dog, and can't stop coughing. -Rob A> (19 years ago, 11-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Project Why? Because I wanna ask!
|
|
(...) I've gone and switched to a news reader cause of the inability to post my email. Works fine via NNTP :) -Rob A> (19 years ago, 10-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Project Why? Because I wanna ask!
|
|
(...) K, have you met me? Fundamentally, I'm lazy. And the code'll already be written such that the wires don't get twisted. I just wanted to try something different, and it'll give me an excuse to use a soldering iron. I'll stay in the scope of the (...) (19 years ago, 10-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Project Why? Because I wanna ask!
|
|
(...) mmmmmmm.... cheese..... (19 years ago, 10-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Project Why? Because I wanna ask!
|
|
(...) No, it's not. The wire ring item increases the flexibility of positioning electric components around a model. It allows you to "do more" over the existing Lego wire. To do the same without it, would require more software (as Derek suggests) or (...) (19 years ago, 10-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Project Why? Because I wanna ask!
|
|
(...) Yeap. Pedantic would describe that pretty well. Wire is wire. JB ps: I've got some of this really quick wire of sale, sensor results arrive 1.75nS earlier than other brands ;) (19 years ago, 10-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Project Why? Because I wanna ask!
|
|
(...) Not to be pedantic but it's pedantic. :) There's been one or two examples. Given an average of five entries per each of our 17 contests, there's bound to be some. But they're isolated situations. If you want to do it, go ahead. I will request (...) (19 years ago, 10-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Project Why? Because I wanna ask!
|
|
(...) Hey, I was told it was a full grown dog. Not a pup. I wouldn't hurt a pup. Might send my cat to teach it a thing or two, but I'd never touch it myself :) JB (19 years ago, 10-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Project Why? Because I wanna ask!
|
|
(...) OH NO YOU DON'T!! You're not framing me for this one, Steve! I had chocolate, and I was only working the GPS-dog locator, *not* actually directing John in the drivers seat. Geesh, one simple little puppy removal, and it gets all bent out of (...) (19 years ago, 9-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Project Why? Because I wanna ask!
|
|
(...) How about coding your robot so it doesn't twist them up in the first place. Adding the turntable in the wire means your wires won't twist up, which means they won't add tension to the connectors which means they won't pull off the connectors (...) (19 years ago, 9-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Project Why? Because I wanna ask!
|
|
(...) not to be pendantic, but can I mention that you've allowed non-official sensors in other competitons before? With the premise that the 'bot 'could do it with regular 'LEGO' sensors, but the builder didn't swap 'em in and used the HiTechnic. I (...) (19 years ago, 9-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
