To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.ca.rtltorontoOpen lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / Canada / rtlToronto / 15747
15746  |  15748
Subject: 
Re: One more rule verification
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
Date: 
Fri, 24 Feb 2006 12:36:43 GMT
Viewed: 
5820 times
  
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Rob Antonishen wrote:
> In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, David Koudys wrote:
> > in my opinion, should be number of unique blocks in both 'bots at the end of the
> > 3 min. 'cause they started in the 1x1x1--in the past, we have allwed multiple
> > 'bots that start within the given space constraints.
> 
> 
> I would agree with that scoring.


I think it should be scored as if it's one robot, which I believe is what you're
saying.

I'm not a fan of the idea of leaving a motionless shell behind.  If we all did
that there would be no space left to move on the field.


> I do wonder about the definition of "in" though.
> 
> If you have a stationary outer shell shaped like an open 'U' with three openings
> and a floor, and a bot that just drives out of the openning of the 'U', would
> blocks collected on the floor be considered "in"...or would the shell have to
> completely encompass the collected bricks (like an "O")?


According to the rules, if a block touchs the arena floor it's out of play, so
the shell would have to have a floor.


Derek



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: One more rule verification
 
(...) I thought of that, but also considered that there will be many different ideas for this competition--one of them is the shell/ROV. One is the Calum'Bot which doesn't move (much). One idea was a completely contained 'bot with everything on (...) (21 years ago, 24-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: One more rule verification
 
(...) I would agree with that scoring. And I want to see your rover climb out of a (min) 5" high shell :) So go for it! I do wonder about the definition of "in" though. If you have a stationary outer shell shaped like an open 'U' with three openings (...) (21 years ago, 23-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

9 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR