Subject:
|
Re: One more rule verification
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Fri, 24 Feb 2006 21:00:54 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1313 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, David Koudys wrote:
> > I think it should be scored as if it's one robot, which I believe is what you're
> > saying.
Okay, if you split in two, then your total score should the same as if you
stayed as one. Fine by me. As long as we don't add the two together as if you
had two separate robots and got to keep the sum of two unique machines.
> > I'm not a fan of the idea of leaving a motionless shell behind. If we all did
> > that there would be no space left to move on the field.
> I thought of that, but also considered that there will be many different ideas
> for this competition--one of them is the shell/ROV. One is the Calum'Bot which
> doesn't move (much). One idea was a completely contained 'bot with everything
> on it--which was the first 'bot I built.
I'm okay with leaving the box behind--it's an alternative solution and while I
agree, I wouldn't want a field of them, I also would like to see as many
different possibilities as DaveK suggests.
Calum
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: One more rule verification
|
| (...) I thought of that, but also considered that there will be many different ideas for this competition--one of them is the shell/ROV. One is the Calum'Bot which doesn't move (much). One idea was a completely contained 'bot with everything on (...) (19 years ago, 24-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
