Subject:
|
Re: Peeron inventories
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 20 Mar 2007 17:06:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5275 times
|
| |
|
|
--snip--
> > And yet one of the corrections you made has already been shown to be wrong and
> > maybe a second one too (I don't know and I don't care if it is or isn't). Most
> > people might take that as a sign that possibly their checking wasn't quite as
> > accurate[1] as they thought it was. And yet I see no such admission from you.
> >
> > I think you must be switched on to the pissed off position, John.
> >
> > Tim
> >
> > [1] Note I use accurate here and not thorough. I have no doubts you are thorough
> > but given set variations, incorrect instructions and other possibilities neither
> > does it make you accurate.
>
> If anyone is spring loaded to the piss off position it is you. Regardless of
> what the page number was, the inventory is incorrect. Valium might be in the
> future for you, or high blood pressure. You really need to calm down. Let's
> remove all emotions here. The facts are that the inventory is incorrect and it
> has not been corrected. No nastiness, no emotion, nothing but facts. That
> inventory and many more are incorrect and have been for a very long time.
> This is not the Bible or Ten Commandments we are talking about, just an
> inventory.
Such a vast banquet of irony in so few words.
> I started long ago pointing this out, October 2006. The only reason
> I posted to Lugnet is that people should know that they are incorrect and if
> people do, maybe they will update them. I have nothing to gain by this, Peeron
> does if they care. So rant and rave all you want but I think that it is
> misdirected. You got a bad case of kill the messenger.
>
> And you do not need to send me any more e-mails with pictures. You are taking
> this a bit too far.
> John P
I have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. Would you care to show one
of these 'emails with pictures' that you refer to? Since I don't remember ever
sending you an email in my life I find the accusation utterly bizarre.
Tim
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Peeron inventories
|
| (...) I thought that I was answering David's e-mail to my e-mail address. Sorry, I am not too sure how to do all these tree things here and there. It wasn't you, It was mad David. John P (18 years ago, 20-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Peeron inventories
|
| (...) If anyone is spring loaded to the piss off position it is you. Regardless of what the page number was, the inventory is incorrect. Valium might be in the future for you, or high blood pressure. You really need to calm down. Let's remove all (...) (18 years ago, 20-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
58 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
