Subject:
|
Re: Peeron inventories
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.inv
|
Date:
|
Thu, 8 Mar 2007 19:15:59 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
10723 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.inv, Jude Beaudin wrote:
> John,
>
> In lugnet.inv, John Patterson wrote:
> > (OCD again.)
>
> I hope that you have professional help with dealing with this condition.
>
> > Now this is a small mistake, but it is an example of what happens in 90% of > your inventories.
>
> Before you said it was 95% but here you state it is 90%. Which is it? Could this
> percentage is hyperbole?
>
> If the problem rate is so high, can you post which sets are correct so we only
> reference those?
>
> > So believe me I have done my homework on this subject. I am also finding that
> > Brick Link has inventories that seem to be better prepared and more work has
> > gone into them.
>
> Then why not adopt BL as your inventory resource?
>
> Jude
Well Jude, the 90% refered to the minor mistakes, 5% are way off, re-read the
part about the this happening in 90%, perhaps you will get it then. 90% small
mistakes with another 5% major mistakes, see?
Hope that this clears up your confusion. I like peeron and that is why I am
trying to HELP. As to my OCD it can be a rather valuable asset at times. I can
post the set numbers but that will take a lot of work, going back through a lot
of emails that I was OCD enough to save. When is this is all done I may do
that.
John
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Peeron inventories
|
| John, (...) I hope that you have professional help with dealing with this condition. (...) Before you said it was 95% but here you state it is 90%. Which is it? Could this percentage is hyperbole? If the problem rate is so high, can you post which (...) (20 years ago, 8-Mar-07, to lugnet.inv)
|
58 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
