Subject:
|
Re: Peeron inventories
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.inv
|
Date:
|
Tue, 20 Mar 2007 02:29:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4989 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.inv, John Patterson wrote:
> I still have not heard from Dan, but I am finding that 95% of the inventories
> are incorrect.
95% incorrect?! That's absurd. It would take someone years to even check all
of them.
> I will list in Lugnet in the comments if the inventory is incorrect
> and, anyone wanting a correct one can email me.
Why would you list on the LUGNET site if an inventory on the Peeron site is
correct or not? Wouldn't you have to constantly recheck the Peeron inventories
to see if they've been updated, and then update the set comments?
If you really find Peeron's inventories to be that unacceptable, you might want
to try using the Bricklink set inventories.
David
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Peeron inventories
|
| (...) Oh David, 95% of what I have checked, around 1000 or so sets. If that is absurb it is not my fault. John P (17 years ago, 20-Mar-07, to lugnet.inv)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Peeron inventories
|
| I still have not heard from Dan, but I am finding that 95% of the inventories are incorrect. I would suggest not to go by the inventories on Peeron as I have now sent in 1000 emails with corrections and pictures and most are just sitting there not (...) (17 years ago, 7-Mar-07, to lugnet.inv)
|
58 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
