Subject:
|
Re: Peeron inventories
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.inv
|
Date:
|
Tue, 20 Mar 2007 04:48:03 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5165 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.inv, David Gregory wrote:
> In lugnet.inv, John Patterson wrote:
> > I still have not heard from Dan, but I am finding that 95% of the inventories
> > are incorrect.
>
> 95% incorrect?! That's absurd. It would take someone years to even check all
> of them.
>
> > I will list in Lugnet in the comments if the inventory is incorrect
> > and, anyone wanting a correct one can email me.
>
> Why would you list on the LUGNET site if an inventory on the Peeron site is
> correct or not? Wouldn't you have to constantly recheck the Peeron inventories
> to see if they've been updated, and then update the set comments?
>
> If you really find Peeron's inventories to be that unacceptable, you might want
> to try using the Bricklink set inventories.
>
> David
Oh David, 95% of what I have checked, around 1000 or so sets. If that is absurb
it is not my fault.
John P
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Peeron inventories
|
| (...) Do you think you'll be able to check/update PICSL as well. That would be a great help. Thanks, Steve (17 years ago, 20-Mar-07, to lugnet.inv)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Peeron inventories
|
| (...) 95% incorrect?! That's absurd. It would take someone years to even check all of them. (...) Why would you list on the LUGNET site if an inventory on the Peeron site is correct or not? Wouldn't you have to constantly recheck the Peeron (...) (17 years ago, 20-Mar-07, to lugnet.inv)
|
58 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
