Subject:
|
Re: Peeron inventories
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 20 Mar 2007 13:25:19 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4956 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Patterson wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Gregory wrote:
> > In lugnet.inv, John Patterson wrote:
> > > In lugnet.inv, David Gregory wrote:
> > > > In lugnet.inv, John Patterson wrote:
> > > > > OK Dan, I have sent picture of 10144 box picture and correction to
> > > > > inv@peeron.com. Now here is what I am talking about: There are
> > > > > two tan bricks 1x6 on page 7 of the instructions.
> > > >
> > > > John, I thought I'd take a little looksie into my own 10144 to
> > > > see what you're talking about. I looked on page 7 of the instructions
> > > > of 10144 and the are NO TAN BRICKS WHATSOEVER! John, I must therefore
> > > > assume that your information is 90-95% incorrect.
> > > >
> > > > Please get some glasses,
> > > >
> > > > David
> > >
> > > David, remember 7 comes after 6 and before 8, perhaps that will help.
> > > John P
> >
> > Yes, it sure does. I rechecked it (page 7 that is), and I stand by my
> > statement; no tan bricks. Perhaps your own inability to count has had a bad
> > impact on the inventories you've made, and that's why they're not being
> > accepted.
> >
> > David
> Look at page 11 then, what I post here is quick, I sit for a very long time when
> I make the corrections and do not quote pages or steps. However you want to cut
> it, there are two tan bricks that are not in the inventory. That is the
> important part.And for your other little snide comment, I posted part of an
> email that I sent to Dan, Try to think out of the box a little. I have had a
> lot of pictures and corrections and inventories accepted. You come into the
> middle of something without any idea of what you are talking about. Nice try.
> John P
And yet one of the corrections you made has already been shown to be wrong and
maybe a second one too (I don't know and I don't care if it is or isn't). Most
people might take that as a sign that possibly their checking wasn't quite as
accurate[1] as they thought it was. And yet I see no such admission from you.
I think you must be switched on to the pissed off position, John.
Tim
[1] Note I use accurate here and not thorough. I have no doubts you are thorough
but given set variations, incorrect instructions and other possibilities neither
does it make you accurate.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Peeron inventories
|
| (...) If anyone is spring loaded to the piss off position it is you. Regardless of what the page number was, the inventory is incorrect. Valium might be in the future for you, or high blood pressure. You really need to calm down. Let's remove all (...) (17 years ago, 20-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Peeron inventories
|
| (...) Look at page 11 then, what I post here is quick, I sit for a very long time when I make the corrections and do not quote pages or steps. However you want to cut it, there are two tan bricks that are not in the inventory. That is the important (...) (17 years ago, 20-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
58 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
