Subject:
|
Re: Peeron inventories
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.inv
|
Date:
|
Tue, 20 Mar 2007 17:20:56 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
6000 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Jude Beaudin wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Patterson wrote:
>
> <Snip other peoples comments>
>
> > Look at page 11 then, what I post here is quick, I sit for a very long time when
> > I make the corrections and do not quote pages or steps. However you want to cut
> > it, there are two tan bricks that are not in the inventory. That is the
> > important part.And for your other little snide comment, I posted part of an
> > email that I sent to Dan, Try to think out of the box a little. I have had a
> > lot of pictures and corrections and inventories accepted. You come into the
> > middle of something without any idea of what you are talking about. Nice try.
> > John P
>
> John,
The way I go about this is to print the Peeron inventory for the set. Then I
match what is in my set. I use the actual set. I then build the model, and any
variations. I note the differences on the printed inventory page. Almost all
my sets since 1974 were bought by me and maintained by me. I have opened
several MISB sets to help complete these inventories. I am in agreement with
you about sets working better than instructions. What I see in Peeron is that
most of the sets were inventoried from the instuctions. some of the pictures
are very misleading in the instructions and most of the time I see how the
errors were made. One thing that I do not understand is how these were then
verified with lots of mistakes. Someone said in one of my previous posts that
Peeron could use a fact checker and that is what I am doing. They just do not
seem to post the corrections.
But yes it is so much better to use the set and that is what I am doing.
John P
> Does this mean that you are using instructions to build your inventories or are
> you using actual MISB set contents? The latter would be a lot more accurate,
> would it not? After all, I have seen errors in LEGO instructions before not to
> mention part substitutions (e.g. the girders in some recent Batman sets while
> diagrammed to be the same as the Studio sets, were in fact a different mold).
>
> Jude
>
> X-FUT .inv since it is addressing set inventory methods
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Peeron inventories
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Patterson wrote: <Snip other peoples comments> (...) John, Does this mean that you are using instructions to build your inventories or are you using actual MISB set contents? The latter would be a lot more accurate, (...) (18 years ago, 20-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.inv)
|
58 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
