Subject:
|
Re: Peeron inventories
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.inv
|
Date:
|
Thu, 8 Mar 2007 13:41:17 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
10740 times
|
| |
|
|
John,
In lugnet.inv, John Patterson wrote:
> (OCD again.)
I hope that you have professional help with dealing with this condition.
> Now this is a small mistake, but it is an example of what happens in 90% of > your inventories.
Before you said it was 95% but here you state it is 90%. Which is it? Could this
percentage is hyperbole?
If the problem rate is so high, can you post which sets are correct so we only
reference those?
> So believe me I have done my homework on this subject. I am also finding that
> Brick Link has inventories that seem to be better prepared and more work has
> gone into them.
Then why not adopt BL as your inventory resource?
Jude
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Peeron inventories
|
| (...) Well Jude, the 90% refered to the minor mistakes, 5% are way off, re-read the part about the this happening in 90%, perhaps you will get it then. 90% small mistakes with another 5% major mistakes, see? Hope that this clears up your confusion. (...) (20 years ago, 8-Mar-07, to lugnet.inv)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Peeron inventories
|
| (...) I did not think that there was a problem because I would go with the inventory on Peeron, not building all the sets. But once I started building them and checking the problem appeared. I was doing this because I wanted to make sure that my (...) (20 years ago, 8-Mar-07, to lugnet.inv)
|
58 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
