Subject:
|
Re: Peeron inventories
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.inv
|
Date:
|
Sun, 18 Mar 2007 16:53:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
6061 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.inv, John Patterson wrote:
> In lugnet.inv, Jennifer L. Boger wrote:
> > In lugnet.inv, John Patterson wrote:
> >
> > > Flak isn't so bad, might get them to listen. I offered to volunteer since I am
> > > retired. I have a lot of gratitude as their data base for parts is great. It
> > > took a lot of work to set up and I am amazed at the effort to get it going.
> > > They just do not want to correct it that it is established. I could not have
> > > done the original work so my hat is off to them. But that was then and now is
> > > now. It is not size that counts, al least to me, but correctness. You are
> > > right about the amount of corrections. But why ask for them if you cannot
> > > handle the load? This is my way of being persistnt. I realize Dan is a nice
> > > guy, no argument there, he would be nicer if he would get the corrections done,
> > > or don't ask. He has always been very nice in his emails to me.
> > > For all the defenders of Peeron. I agree, great site, one of a kind, easy to
> > > access and Dan is ok. I never said Dan was not. I just would like to see that
> > > it is correct. Sorry to have offended any of Peeron's defenders, I am trying to
> > > point something out.
> > > John P
> >
> > John-
> >
> > Please don't say we don't "want" to correct the inventory system. In 2007 so
> > far we have made 3827 changes and additions (this does not include the
> > instruction or catalog scan library). In 2006: 16071.
> >
> > Jennifer Boger
>
> Jennifer:
> Sorry I did not answer sooner, was on vacation. I understand all the additions,
> just seemed like there would be an eagerness to correct what is there before
> adding more. Seems that it is more important to be the most correct rather than
> the biggest, but that is just me.
> Take care
> John P
John-
I said "changes" and additions. That includes corrections. I'm very sure we
did not add 16000+ NEW inventories last year.
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Peeron inventories
|
| (...) Jennifer and Dan: I realize that, but correcting seems to be low priority. Here is an example of what I am talking about. I just finished 7720 Battery Train set last night. It was inventoried from the instructions by Peeron. Please pull up the (...) (18 years ago, 18-Mar-07, to lugnet.inv)
| | | Re: Peeron inventories
|
| Jennifer: Here are some more examples. I finshed three more sets last night. Pull up the instructions for 7838. There are 12 3062b brick round black, step 22. 3010 brick 1x4 red there are 4, step 2 and 4 for the crane. the blue plate 3666 is not (...) (18 years ago, 19-Mar-07, to lugnet.inv)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Peeron inventories
|
| (...) Jennifer: Sorry I did not answer sooner, was on vacation. I understand all the additions, just seemed like there would be an eagerness to correct what is there before adding more. Seems that it is more important to be the most correct rather (...) (18 years ago, 16-Mar-07, to lugnet.inv)
|
58 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
