To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 26186
26185  |  26187
Subject: 
Re: Is religion dead in the water?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sat, 16 Oct 2004 01:21:12 GMT
Viewed: 
1386 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Orion Pobursky wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Laswell wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd wrote:
   It is entirely dependent on approach. I’ve seen atheists who approach it as a religion, and others that do not. Generally, the more strident and absolutist an atheist is, the more it approaches a religion. The more dispassionate and scientific it is, the more the religion tag fails.

...until it becomes agnosticism, the only true non-religion. The fundamental difference between atheists and agnostics is that atheism, like all religions, makes firm dogmatic claims regarding the existence of a supernatural being and the creation of the universe. Agnosticism only declares, “Nothing has been proven, so I don’t know,” and leaves it at that.

Actually you’re confusing terms here. Agnostics believe that the existance of God is “inherently unknowable” whereas (most) atheists believe that God’s existance is “unproven”. There is a relativly small faction of atheists (known as hard atheists) that state God “does not exist” but this opinion is shunned by most atheists since, as you stated above, this point of view is just as dogmatic as the belief in God’s existance.


You summed up what I would have responded with very succinctly, Orion. I agree with you assessment of atheists, and proper definition of agnostics.

-->Bruce<--



Message has 1 Reply:
  Definitions vs. Daffynitions (was Re: Is religion dead in the water?
 
(...) I do too. It might make sense to keep it bookmarked! (20 years ago, 16-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Is religion dead in the water?
 
(...) Actually you're confusing terms here. Agnostics believe that the existance of God is "inherently unknowable" whereas (most) atheists believe that God's existance is "unproven". There is a relativly small faction of atheists (known as hard (...) (20 years ago, 16-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

70 Messages in This Thread:
























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR