Subject:
|
Re: Is lgbt dead in the water?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 15 Oct 2004 15:42:30 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1624 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote:
| |
Too often an imprecisely-disclaimed statement is
bludgeoned out of context, or an unintended ambiguity is taken as a explicit
forfeiture of the argument.
|
Shouldn’t that be “declaimed”, and not “disclaimed”? On no! Your entire
argument now has now been forfeited! Nyahh. Nyahh, nyahh, nyahh. ;-)
-->Bruce<--
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Is lgbt dead in the water?
|
| (...) I did not rip you. I cautioned you against the use of a Straw Man falacy in misapplying the definition of tolerance, but that's a discussion of rhetoric. If you perceived my addressing of your rhetorical shortcomings as a "rip" on you (...) (20 years ago, 15-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
70 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
