To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 26171
26170  |  26172
Subject: 
Re: Is lgbt dead in the water?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 15 Oct 2004 04:12:36 GMT
Viewed: 
1268 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
   Many people view atheism as a belief system rather than a religion. Your points still stand, nonetheless, but I did want to point it out.

What is a religion, if not a “belief system”? Just because atheism is not an organized religion doesn’t mean it’s not a religion at all.

   I’ll go farther, and state that I feel that people who consistently call atheism a religion are, in my view, exhibiting a false understanding of the nature of religion. I suspect (without proof) that you were shortcutting rather than that you actually hold that belief.

You must have missed my lengthy discussion with Mr. Schuler regarding the fundamental differences between atheism, agnosticism, and Unitarianism/Universalism. The only areligious state is to be a true agnostic (by the original definition, not the modern “I believe in god, but I can’t decide which one” version), where you have not firmly decided against the possibility of a supernatural power, but you refuse to accept any of them as being real without concrete proof. When you’re a true atheist, you have clear beliefs regarding supernatural powers and their role in the origin of the universe. As I said then, there is a big difference between not believing in any god and believing in not-god.



Message has 3 Replies:
  Re: Is lgbt dead in the water?
 
(...) All religions are belief systems, but not all belief systems are religions. (...) Nor does it necessarily mean that it is. (...) No, I didn't miss it, I just wasn't convinced. My take then was that you were arguing by assertion. I'll take this (...) (20 years ago, 15-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
  Re: Is religion dead in the water?
 
(...) It is entirely dependent on approach. I've seen atheists who approach it as a religion, and others that do not. Generally, the more strident and absolutist an atheist is, the more it approaches a religion. The more dispassionate and scientific (...) (20 years ago, 15-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
  Re: Is lgbt dead in the water?
 
(...) Dictionary.com gives a serviceable definition of (URL) religion,> a definition with which I find myself in general agreement. In casual parlance I would pare it down a little further to say that religion entails the worship of and/or positive (...) (20 years ago, 15-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Is lgbt dead in the water?
 
(...) Many people view atheism as a belief system rather than a religion. Your points still stand, nonetheless, but I did want to point it out. I'll go farther, and state that I feel that people who consistently call atheism a religion are, in my (...) (20 years ago, 15-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

70 Messages in This Thread:
























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR