Debate : 19204


Off-Topic / Debate / 19204	19203 \| 19205

Subject:	Re: We love our guns!!-- was Re: Dan Rather is a Useful Idiot Extraordinare
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Fri, 28 Feb 2003 17:18:16 GMT
Viewed:	863 times

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys writes: > Refutation--the camera itself didn't cause the accident--the camera didn't > change the timing of the lights. Thanks for clearing that up. Your assertion in this case is that the cameras themselves are not causative? Rather they are merely tools and it's the people (governments in this case) that use them improperly which cause the problem? So why ban red light cameras, they're not the problem! Merely ban their improper use. Then you agree, presumably, that: "the gun didn't cause the crime--the gun didn't change the motive of the shooter", right? So why ban guns, they're not the problem! Merely ban their improper use.

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: We love our guns!!-- was Re: Dan Rather is a Useful Idiot Extraordinare
(...) Oh if wishing made it so. I would love to see the day when we would enact laws banning the improper usage of guns. Well, we do already and it's known as 'the law'. Now here's a situation--can we regulate red light cameras and non-interference (...) (22 years ago, 28-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: We love our guns!!-- was Re: Dan Rather is a Useful Idiot Extraordinare
(...) Refutation--the camera itself didn't cause the accident--the camera didn't change the timing of the lights. Saying something like there's causality between the camera and the accidents is like saying thre's causality between people waking up (...) (22 years ago, 28-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

92 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search