Subject:
|
Re: We love our guns!!-- was Re: Dan Rather is a Useful Idiot Extraordinare
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 15:31:39 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
642 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys writes:
> I plainly, clearly, and straight forwardly said that removing guns from the
> criminals as well as the citizens will reduce the gun related violence.
> Less guns = less gun related violence. Truth. Deal with it.
But I think the point that was made to you in response to that assertion is
that it is a canard-- it will never happen, and so you really could never prove
it anyway.
But people have thought along those lines and tried to ban guns anyway. Again
it was pointed out that in all cases, disarming the population *increases*
violent crime. It's a no brainer. If the bad guy is the only one with a gun,
he will be *emboldened*, not thwarted. Taking my gun away does not magically
disarm the bad guy.
So unless you are able to enact your premise "No guns = no gun related
violence" (which Larry conceded you, BTW), your statement is false (as borne
out *in reality*). Truth. Deal with it.
JOHN
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
92 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
