Subject:
|
Re: Dan Rather is a Useful Idiot Extraordinare
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 27 Feb 2003 19:39:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
321 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:
<snipped the stuff I mostly agree with>
> All that aside--the NRO is exactly right to identify the interview as a PR
> gambit for Rather, as opposed to any sort of kind of serious journalism.
> It's hard to fault Rather for failing to condemn Saddam to his face, but
> that just tells me the interview shouldn't have happened in the first place.
> Shame on Rather in any case.
Why is it hard to fault Rather? I'm a bit lost on that part. I don't think
it's hard at all! Is it hard because he's developmentally disadvantaged or
something?
I just wonder if the rot goes all the way up Viacom or what.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Dan Rather is a Useful Idiot Extraordinare
|
| (...) I'm sorry--I'm working up from the bottom of two Tylennol Cold capsules, so fingers well very working my aren't. Yes indeed, Rather should be ridiculed/blasted/condemned for this sweeps stunt. My poorly prefaced statement should have begin (...) (22 years ago, 27-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Dan Rather is a Useful Idiot Extraordinare
|
| (...) and (...) Granted, the NRO makes no overtures of impartiality, but I don't recall anyone "rallying around" Rather prior to or following the idiotic interview. Bill Maher decried it last night on Larry King Live, and I know of at least several (...) (22 years ago, 27-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
92 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
