To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 19183
19182  |  19184
Subject: 
Re: Dan Rather is a Useful Idiot Extraordinare
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 05:19:51 GMT
Viewed: 
716 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys writes:

If ther are no guns, either in homes or in the streets (read in the hands of
criminals) then there can be no gun related violence.  No hidden meaning, no
fallacy at all.

Tell you what. I'll concede that... if you can *completely* eliminate guns
from the surface of the earth, no one will be killed with guns any more, or
at least not until the aliens come.

But I'll ***only*** concede that in return for a concession on your part,
namely, IF you concede that:

1) there's no way to actually do that, so there will still be some guns

and

2) if there still are some guns, but citizens can't have them, outlaws(1)
will have them more than citizens will.

1 - either civilian thugs or military thugs, depending

Bet you won't admit it though, will you? It shreds your argument completely.
That's not hiding behind old paper, that's not fallacy, that's just the way
the world is. You're a self admitted dreamer, out of touch with reality.

But this is a distraction, it's plowed ground, and it's off topic for this
thread. There is another active thread you can hang your fallacy on (and
your ducking the issue that the second amendment isn't about crime, it isn't
about hunting, it's about the final check and balance we chose to have) if
you want, OK?  I started it just for you.

Please leave it off this one. This one is about Dan Rather being an idiot.
Since everyone seems to agree, we're done, right?



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Dan Rather is a Useful Idiot Extraordinare
 
(...) Yeah I think we can all agree on that. -Mike Petrucelli (22 years ago, 28-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  We love our guns!!-- was Re: Dan Rather is a Useful Idiot Extraordinare
 
(...) Yeah, that's the dreamer part of me... but it's completely true. (...) I like how you do away with the rest of the logically constructed arguement, that if you *reduce* the number of guns, you will reduce the number of gun related cases of (...) (22 years ago, 28-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Dan Rather is a Useful Idiot Extraordinare
 
(...) Hit fudge hasn't killed anybody, that I recall-I could be wrong. Ask a father what he wants done to the criminal who had just raped and killed his daughter. Weak willed? I don't think so--I'm just glad that laws are supposedly made by rational (...) (22 years ago, 28-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

92 Messages in This Thread:

























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR