To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 19186
19185  |  19187
Subject: 
Re: Dan Rather is a Useful Idiot Extraordinare
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 06:03:16 GMT
Viewed: 
738 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Mike Petrucelli writes:
Please leave it off this one. This one is about Dan Rather being an idiot.
Since everyone seems to agree, we're done, right?

Yeah I think we can all agree on that.

-Mike Petrucelli


Okay, everyone agrees that Dan Rather is an idiot.  Except me.  Not that I
have the answer: I wasn't idiotic enough to watch him in the first place.

Perhaps I do have the answer.  :-)

-->Bruce<--

Okay, 'fess up: who was idiotic enough to declare Dan Rather an idiot but
watch him anyway?

Of course, I'm watching a slow motion race for hours (America's Cup), so
perhaps I'm not as clever as I like to think....

I missed Rather's interview--I think it was on during 'Enterprise' or 'The
West Wing', not that I really bothered to check when it was on--I lumped it,
mistakenly or not, in the 'Let's get ratings at any cost' group, and I don't
seem to appreciate the 'ratings at any cost' group.

I have now read the transcript (as linked in an earlier post) but came away
not knowing anything more than I knew before--He 'won' his 'election' with
100 percent of the votes?  Did Rather ask who he ran against, or how someone
would get their name on the ballot?  Nope.  What type of journalist would
forego journalistic integrity in favour of ratings?  Not one I wish to watch.

Yeah, I reiterate, a completely wasted opportunity to do some true journalism.

My boycott of CBS continues...

Dave K



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Dan Rather is a Useful Idiot Extraordinare
 
(...) Okay, everyone agrees that Dan Rather is an idiot. Except me. Not that I have the answer: I wasn't idiotic enough to watch him in the first place. Perhaps I do have the answer. :-) -->Bruce<-- Okay, 'fess up: who was idiotic enough to declare (...) (22 years ago, 28-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

92 Messages in This Thread:

























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR