Subject:
|
Re: End of Year Thoughts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Sat, 1 Dec 2001 02:58:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
620 times
|
| |
|
|
> In lugnet.general, Benjamin Medinets writes:
> I think you started good about the market changing, but you missed the boat.
> Yes, the market changes, but like others have posted, sometimes you have
> success in your core line, especially when it had been sooo successful
> historically.
If you're company thinking of not concentrating on your core product, I
think two words should immediately come to mind...
New Coke
This was a monumental disaster.
> I am not saying Mindstorms wasn't a welcome change, and in some respects,
> Bionicle, though it lacks appeal to many of us "traditional" enthusiasts,
> just might bring a new generation of fans to Lego....
Or... create a generation of Bionicle fans who don't even know that it's
made by a company called 'LEGO'
> I might be stepping off a cliff with this statement, but I think if Lego
> isn't going to return to traditional styled sets (new ones, not
> reintroduced, and definitely NOT juniorized sets), then I think Lego should
> increase its Bulk offerings so fans like me, can get the pieces we need
> without buying whole sets.....
You are not stepping off any cliff. And you are not alone in your thinking.
The simple fact is that if the company won't (for whatever unknown reason)
put out some things that at least resemble traditional brick-based sets,
then open the ability to buy in bulk at reasonable prices.
What frustrates me most about that 'Ultimate LEGO Book' are those sculptures
near the back done by so-called 'artists'. Who are these people and why do
they clearly get access to bricks that the general public can't buy?
Similarly, the book goes to great lengths to flaunt the work done by LEGO's
internal designers for the theme parks, but oddly forgets to tell you that
it's impossible to buy such bricks in any reasonably significant quantities.
Utterly frustrated,
Allan B.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: End of Year Thoughts
|
| (...) I don't think I totally agree with this statement. Maybe it was me, but my family didn't have a lot of "disposable" income (I got no allowance), and I would call me family a little bit on the old fashioned, (subdued-factor), but I had ways of (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.general)
|
60 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
