Subject:
|
Re: End of Year Thoughts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 29 Nov 2001 14:59:44 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
506 times
|
| |
|
|
"Arne Lykke Nielsen" <arln@wanadoo.dk> wrote in message news:GnJyEn.K8@lugnet.com...
> In the Danish TV News this week they said, that TLC's financial performance
> for 2001 was saved by the tremendous succes of the Harry Potter sets.
It would be interesting to know to what extent they were 'saved by Harry Potter'.
For example, would they have made another loss without HP?
What lines were successful, which ones were not?
I would imagine that Bionical was successful too - much as I personally dislike it
The problem with being saved by HP is it might give them a smoke screen to hide behind in terms of declaring
"everything's OK, we increased revenue, we made profit" type statements, wheras it was only the fortunate timing of
someone elses idea that saved their Danish bacon, and all the other mistakes they made are forgotten or swep under the
carpet.
lawrence
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: End of Year Thoughts
|
| (...) I agree. It would be such fun to see product-by-product, theme-by-theme & year-by-year how the company performs. I expect we shall never see that sort of data, but one can dream... The biggest turkey must be ZNAP. I expect it is too soon, but (...) (23 years ago, 29-Nov-01, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: End of Year Thoughts
|
| (...) In the Danish TV News this week they said, that TLC's financial performance for 2001 was saved by the tremendous succes of the Harry Potter sets. I think the issue for TLC is timing - if Adventurers had been out ten years earlier (at the time (...) (23 years ago, 29-Nov-01, to lugnet.general)
|
60 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
