To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.dear-legoOpen lugnet.dear-lego in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Dear LEGO / 3450
3449  |  3451
Subject: 
Re: I can't tolerate this *juniorization* Either
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego
Date: 
Wed, 12 Sep 2001 23:23:59 GMT
Viewed: 
376 times
  
It is just another recent rip-off lego seems to be trying to pull on
its now dwindling consumers.

I actually disagree with that, but the disappointment behind it is much the
same. This change in quality and piece quantity that we see is really a
change in target audience for Lego (and a poor one in my opinion). Where
Lego once held the appeal of so many ages by having sets with enough
complexity so that all could appreciate them but having directions that
younger kids (4 - 6) could figure out, they now really have honed down their
audience to either those small kids, or their parents.


I can hardly call Jack stone Lego, for the possibilities of creating new
models other than the designated one are about equal to taking apart a $1
toy that was made in china and then trying to make something else
interesting out of it- just will not happen.

Again, the change in audience really is what makes Lego think that they
"may" be able to survive on this course. The parents of the new generation
who have played with Lego dont' have the experience or knowledge to look at
what is for sale and know that in comparison to a decade ago, they are
tragic at best. The younger kids as well, of course, have no ability to hold
judgement or comparison, they just want the colored pieces. So Lego is
trying to prey off of a bit of naivety therefore cutting loose the true
collectors and builders of Legos.

And at $10 a piece, what 5 year old can even afford to waste $40
on them.
I don't see the purpose of dinosaurs. It reminds me again of a $1 "made in
china" toy.

Same deal... I guess what I don't understand is that when push comes to
shove, it is the true and dedicated Lego collectors that buy the most Legos
each year. Likewise, unfortunately for Lego, these are the same people who
have the ability to notice that Lego is trying to cut people short with
packing the price with pieces that 5 years ago, could be made out of 3, 5,
or even ten pieces. So I must admit to being confused. Lego seems to be
missing something easy and in the end, it could mean their downfall which
looks to have already well begun.


Yes and no.  LEGO Direct *is* listening.  I only have one gripe about them
(bulk), about everything else nothing but praise.  However, LEGO Futura in
Billund appears to be not listening.  That's evident in things like Dinosaurs
and Jack Stone.

Dont' know if Lego is listening or not, but I'd have to say they're not
acting wisely. However, kutos to the younger collectors who have also noted
the drop in quality and bring it up for discussion.



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: I can't tolerate this *juniorization* Either
 
"Jonathan B. McKay" <vebblejm@aol.com> wrote in message news:GJ4Ito.DnJ@lugnet.com... (...) Yup. My one gripe about LEGO Direct is the bulk brick prices. With the 1200 pc retailing for 20.00 originally, 1.6 cents/piece was a STEAL. It helped out a (...) (23 years ago, 5-Sep-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego)

74 Messages in This Thread:































Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR