To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.dear-legoOpen lugnet.dear-lego in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Dear LEGO / 2637
2636  |  2638
Subject: 
LEGO is listening! (was...are you listening?)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.lego, lugnet.dear-lego
Date: 
Sat, 4 Nov 2000 08:45:44 GMT
Highlighted: 
!! (details)
Viewed: 
301 times
  
Dear LEGO fans,

The LEGO Company IS listening.  I have spent some time reading the posts
here tonight and you can rest assured that the company is well aware of
LUGNET and your concerns, desires and feedback.

As some of you have acknowledged, there is quite a bit of discussion going
on here that can prove difficult for the Company to respond to. We may
indeed have the answers but two issues come to mind: time and "appropriateness."

As you might imagine, the lack of time is one of the significant factors
that hinders our responses.  To write a detailed response that caters to
your needs is quite a complex task.  Some of your questions would require
volumes to answer rather than a short, quick message.  Case in point:
"Juniorization." I can tell you right now that kids have told the Company
that they have less time to build and want things that are faster to build,
therefore the Company has created what you call "Juniorized" sets.  [The
very fact that I mentioned this is likely to solicit a mile long response
which we will not likely be able to respond to(which brings me to the next
point).]

Although there are many LEGO employees like myself who review these
comments, the guidelines are not clear as to who should be the official
voice for such questions. Typically our communications teams handle "media"
inquiries but web initiatives such as LUGNET threads fall into a loosely
defined category. Because of this, many of our co-workers choose not to
respond fearing that it is not appropriate for them to be a voice of the
Company.

It is a fact that the Company could improve our online communications to
you.  Perhaps Brad and I will have an internal discussion about this. My
guess is that you may not require a response to every post but you would
certainly like to know we are listening.

We are.

Ashley Glennon
Manager of Sales, Promotions and Sponsorships
LEGOLAND California



Message has 16 Replies:
  Re: LEGO is listening! (was...are you listening?)
 
(...) WOW!; So they really are listening? I dont know about this response. I f I was a kid I would go for the box witha higher piece number (...) (24 years ago, 4-Nov-00, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.dear-lego)
  Re: LEGO is listening! (was...are you listening?)
 
Mr. Ashley Glennon, LEGO company should cater our needs too. Have you paid attention on the price of 6399 in ebay auction? It is really terrible! We have to pay much money on them. Have you compiled how many design for your police station, fire (...) (24 years ago, 4-Nov-00, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.dear-lego)
  Re: LEGO is listening! (was...are you listening?)
 
Hello Nice to know somebody is at least reading these. For your explanation for Juniorization, i cannot except that, i spend too much time in the stores searching for OLD Lego to think that, who are the ones buying these overpriced Junior city sets, (...) (24 years ago, 4-Nov-00, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.dear-lego)
  Re: LEGO is listening! (was...are you listening?)
 
Dear Ashley, (...) I for one, and most of the other members of LUGNET, do appreciate it. I think all of us are passionate about your product, and we wish your company to do as well as it can. (...) "appropriateness." As a worker for a rather large (...) (24 years ago, 4-Nov-00, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.dear-lego)
  Re: LEGO is listening! (was...are you listening?)
 
(...) And acted on that too. We noticed the bulk sets, UCS and scrupture sets. (...) But does that let you sell more sets? The only benefit I can see is the reduction of minimum age from 5 to 4. By that reason Playmobile should be doing very well. (...) (24 years ago, 4-Nov-00, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.dear-lego)
  Re: LEGO is listening! (was...are you listening?)
 
(...) Does this make any sense? Why would you want to make a product that a kid can be done with in 5 minutes and then forget about? Wouldn't you want kids to spend a lot of time with your product, so they become attached to it (like I did when I (...) (24 years ago, 4-Nov-00, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.dear-lego)
  Re: LEGO is listening! (was...are you listening?)
 
(...) Which I personally find amazing: the AFOLs are not dismissed by the company as the lunatic fringe, which has a tendency to happen when a VP hears about Internet fans. We have seen movement to acknowledge the die-hards, such as bulk and (yay!) (...) (24 years ago, 4-Nov-00, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.dear-lego)
  Re: LEGO is listening! (was...are you listening?)
 
"Ashley Glennon" <ashleyg@america.lego.com> wrote in message news:G3HsC9.JG@lugnet.com... (...) [snipped small part about time and appropriateness] (...) build, (...) I was wondering, reading those two paragraphs... 1) LEGO asks kids what they want (...) (24 years ago, 5-Nov-00, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.dear-lego)
  Re: LEGO is listening! (was...are you listening?)
 
Hello Ashley, as I must accept your decision for "juniorizing" (even if I have mixed feelings about it) I think that the result is bad for the hard-core-legoists. Browsing through the 2001 lego prospect, I badly miss more big technic boxes. But (...) (24 years ago, 5-Nov-00, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.dear-lego)
  LEGO is listening! Juniorization!!!!!!!
 
I myself have read 40+ messages & Ashly's response. I offer this thought.... LEGO by Danish definition means "to play well" You can interpurt this how ever you want but following this statement, it is said that 3 peices 4x4x2 can combine to produce (...) (24 years ago, 6-Nov-00, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.dear-lego)
  Re: LEGO is listening! (was...are you listening?)
 
(...) I can't belive this is true. Perhaps you meant "Parents have less time to spend with their kids." Everything I have heard, from kids, parents and various toy store employees that interact directly with them, is that "this set doesn't have (...) (24 years ago, 6-Nov-00, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.dear-lego)
  Re: LEGO is listening! (was...are you listening?)
 
(...) "appropriateness." <snip> (...) These words seem somewhat hollow to me. I emailed Brad at Lego Direct over a month ago and asked for a reply indicating receipt (since I knew he was busy) and have yet to receive anything. But the server did not (...) (24 years ago, 6-Nov-00, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.dear-lego)
  Re: LEGO is listening! (was...are you listening?)
 
(...) I hope you read all the ideas as well ;-) (...) Not to mention the age old issue of 'comerical' confidentiality. (...) Commerical Fanzine? Might need some new staff and an editor but I feel this might be a way of explaning things. It worked (...) (24 years ago, 6-Nov-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego)
  Re: LEGO is listening! (was...are you listening?)
 
(...) Mr. Glennon: Based upon a) the terrific piece count/price ratio of current Megablok sets, and b) the large amounts of basic bricks in these sets, I'd say that Megablok's marketing research has led them to the opposite conclusion. It seems that (...) (24 years ago, 6-Nov-00, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.dear-lego)  
  Re: LEGO is listening! (was...are you listening?)
 
Ashley thank you very much for your reply. I realize that it is very hard in todays economy to respond about a company's business and marketing in an open forum. I am a product manager and am currently employed by an internet security company and (...) (24 years ago, 6-Nov-00, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.dear-lego)
  Re: LEGO is listening! (was...are you listening?)
 
"Ashley Glennon" <ashleyg@america.lego.com> wrote in message news:G3HsC9.JG@lugnet.com... (...) build, (...) Well! You certainly predicted it! Let me just chime in, as the father of a 9 year old girl -- she doesn't have much time (what, with FIRST (...) (24 years ago, 7-Nov-00, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.dear-lego)

Message is in Reply To:
  ARE you paying attention, LEGO???...???
 
I have just spent 1/2 hour reading the "are you listening lego" thread: Here we have a large conversation about you, and we haven't even heard a peep out of you. (or at least I haven't) I've probably posted this same message 2 or 3 times before, but (...) (24 years ago, 3-Nov-00, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.dear-lego) !! 

61 Messages in This Thread:





























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR