Subject:
|
Re: Lego Direct (was Re: Georgia LEGO Outlet is Cool!)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 29 Mar 2000 06:27:08 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1467 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
> Haven't heard any complaints about Mike yet, w.r.t. the argument.
No, that's incorrect -- you have heard my complaint. And I would tend to
think that it counts as much as any other persons complaint. [Remember Todd,
I am on Lugnet based on your specific and personal invitation and despite my
fiery writing style.]
At http://www.lugnet.com/dear-lego/?n=2007, Mike states:
> So take your snide remarks about favoritism and elitism and whatever else and
> stuff 'em.
"Stuff 'em" is a variant of "Stuff it."
stuff it Vulgar Slang.
Used as an intensive to express extreme anger, frustration, or disgust.
-- The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Third Edition
copyright © 1992 by Houghton Mifflin Company.
But just to be sure, I asked someone what it meant:
> ME: how do you take the phrase "Stuff 'em?" What does it mean and what does
> it imply?
> OTHER: I need context
> ME: "So take your snide remarks about favoritism and elitism and whatever
> else and stuff 'em."
> OTHER:it means shove it up your ass. But it is a nicer way of saying it
So if Tom and I can be banned for mere vulgarity, so can Mike. Isn't that
fair?
I say all three of us, or none of us. Anything else is you just choosing up
favorites.
Ine the meanwhile, I am going to post below what I responded to Mike's post as
mentioned above:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In lugnet.dear-lego at: http://www.lugnet.com/dear-lego/?n=2007, Mike Stanley
writes:
> And for the record, I suggested PLENTY of times that they put up their own
> website. I would have been THRILLED to stop doing it, as I know Tom would be.
So in reality, we agree -- you just don't like my word choice, rhetorical
style, or syntax?
Sheeesh!!!
And I did say it was a "generous gesture." I don't know why you are so mad
about it. I'm sure everyone appreciates it a lot.
> So take your snide remarks about favoritism and elitism and whatever else and
> stuff 'em.
Well, no, there we would have to disagree!
But BTW, I did not introduce the terms "elitism" or "elitist" into this
discussion. In fact, it was either yourself or Poindexter -- I can't recall
which. Y'all have Richard confusions, and I have Mike ones. Sorry.
-- Richard
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
51 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
