Subject:
|
Re: Lego Direct (was Re: Georgia LEGO Outlet is Cool!)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 29 Mar 2000 16:27:51 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1642 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
> Langauge aside, .dear-lego isn't the place to stir up a big off-topic[1]
> commotion like that. I'll bet you could stir up the same commotion in
> .off-topic.debate or .market.theory and not get complained about by half
> a dozen or more people.
> [1] off-topic to .dear-lego, that is.
Tp be fair then, it does take two to tango- and only one to either a) place a
followup-to an appropriate group or b) remember that Lugnet is supposed to be
about fun, shrug and walk away.
Was this post any more on-topic for lugnet.dear-lego? Was it any less
incendiary than anything Richard Marchetti or Tom Stangl posted?
http://www.lugnet.com/dear-lego/?n=2017
Personally, I find taking a shot at someone who is incapable of replying in the
same forum to be more offensive than language. But it takes a lot of bad
language to offend me. :D
Either way, though, it would have been nice if someone involved had done A or B
above. But I don't think anyone involved is any less to blame than any other
involced party.
eric
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
51 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
