General Discussions about LUGNET : 5664


Administrative / General / 5664	5663 \| 5665

Subject:	Re: Lego Direct (was Re: Georgia LEGO Outlet is Cool!)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.admin.general
Date:	Wed, 29 Mar 2000 07:30:15 GMT
Viewed:	1701 times

In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes: > Langauge aside, .dear-lego isn't the place to stir up a big off-topic[1] > commotion like that. I'll bet you could stir up the same commotion in > .off-topic.debate or .market.theory and not get complained about by half > a dozen or more people. For the record: that wasn't my intention. And actually, I resent the implication that it WAS my intention -- but I will give you the benefit of the doubt, and assume instead that your words get sloppy sometimes too. But I have already tried to explain several times now how and why I took steps to avoid this storm of nonsense. You either believe in my sincerity or you don't. The manner in which others included themselves into my argument was absolutely self-imposed. Spellbinding, in fact...who can account for it? -- Richard

Message has 4 Replies:

		Re: Lego Direct (was Re: Georgia LEGO Outlet is Cool!)
(...) No one can speak to what another person's intention actually is, until and unless some sort of perfect mind reading device is built (and I hope that never happens, but I digress). All I can judge by is the outcome of actions. No one's perfect (...) (24 years ago, 29-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general) !

		Re: Lego Direct (was Re: Georgia LEGO Outlet is Cool!)
(...) I don't. Although I do believe your attempt to characterize my posts as being implicitly vulgar (as opposed to your explicitly vulgar ones) coincides quite well with the assumption that it WAS your intention to inflame. :) (24 years ago, 29-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

		Re: Lego Direct (was Re: Georgia LEGO Outlet is Cool!)
(...) You resent it? Poor baby. Given the fact that you said this: (...) and this: (...) and this: (...) (by the way, is that implicitly vulgar?) and this: (...) (oh and as an aside, when you said this: (...) I guess you weren't saying explicitly (...) (24 years ago, 29-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general) !

		Re: Lego Direct (was Re: Georgia LEGO Outlet is Cool!)
(...) No implication or insinuation of intentions was made. Whether intentional or unintentional, as one of the main participants (if not the main participant), the result was that you said things which stirred up (or helped stir up, or were a (...) (24 years ago, 29-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general) !

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Lego Direct (was Re: Georgia LEGO Outlet is Cool!)
(...) Langauge aside, .dear-lego isn't the place to stir up a big off-topic[1] commotion like that. I'll bet you could stir up the same commotion in .off-topic.debate or .market.theory and not get complained about by half a dozen or more people. (...) (24 years ago, 29-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general) !

51 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search