| |
In lugnet.admin.general, Richard Marchetti writes:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > That to me suggests that at least there is a defacto standard based on the
> > technology of how things work.
>
> That seems pretty reasonable to me provided you allow that I could have failed
> to implement that DE FACTO standard due to the fact that there is no OBJECTIVE
> standard and still be faultless.
>
> And that still doesn't address the fact that I created a hypothetical
> situation, universalized my example, and tried to specifically depersonalize
> the subject under discussion.
>
> I think when someone does ALL of that and then you still think its about you
> and your anecdotal circumstances, then
>
> YOU HAVE SELECTED YOURSELF IN FOR INCLUSION IN THE ARGUMENT
>
> and are then free to have the fun you so richly deserve.
>
> Larry, you seem like a guy with at least a head on his shoulders -- try using
> that head just a little bit and just stand down. The argument is just the
> four of us now (practically!), and Todd doesn't want to play anymore...
>
> ... and for me it was NEVER about you or anyone else, it was about TLC policy.
>
> XOXOXO,
>
> Richard
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
51 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
