Robotics : 25352


Robotics / 25352	25351 \| 25353

Subject:	Re: How many people signed up for the NXT Developer's Program?
Newsgroups:	lugnet.robotics
Date:	Thu, 19 Jan 2006 01:57:13 GMT
Viewed:	2028 times

In lugnet.robotics, steve <sjbaker1@airmail.net> wrote: > I can't see myself using Lego software on this thing. I can, for at least two reasons: (a) It will likely exist at ship-time. I don't know that the same can be said of a BrickOS port (or a NQC port, which is actually where I'd like to go). (b) The LEGO software may be able to do a lot of things, and do them well. I'm certain there will be good reasons to develop 3rd party software (I've got some myself). But until we dig under the hood and find out what we *can* do with the software/hardware, it's kinda silly to say "it won't do what I want". Or that 3rd party software can "fix" it (my "dream project" may bump up against hardware, not software, limits first). -- Brian Davis

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: How many people signed up for the NXT Developer's Program?
(...) I use Linux on all my PC's - the Lego software won't even run - so FOR SURE I won't be using the Lego software. I doubt it'll be very hard to figure out how to get gcc to compile for the NXT...but if nobody else has it figured out by then, (...) (18 years ago, 19-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: How many people signed up for the NXT Developer's Program?
(...) I would bet good money that more hobbyists will want to have multiple NXT's talking to each other than educationalists. I can see LegOS (or something similar in concept) implementing bluetooth drivers. I can't see myself using Lego software on (...) (18 years ago, 19-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)

77 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search