Subject:
|
Re: Lets keep politics out of Lego
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 24 Nov 2000 12:30:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
691 times
|
| |
| |
Dave Schuler wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Gerry Venteicher writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
> > >
> > > Gerry, please don't mention the "L" word here-- it is OT and not welcome;-)
> > > But politics are happily discussed-- howa 'bout those fraudulent Dems who are
> > > about to get royally busted for rampant voter fraud in Florida??
> >
> > John,
> > Isn't the words fraudulent Democrats an oximoron.
>
> Unless I miss your intent, the word you're probably aiming for is redundancy.
> Unless I miss your intent, the word you're probably aiming for is redundancy.
>
> > Was there ever any doubt that they would try to pull something.
>
> Especially given Republicans' long-standing tradition of honesty,
> integrity, and family values.
<snigger> Yeah, right. Republicans....honesty...integrity. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAAA!
I think ANY politician won't fit will with those terms after any appreciable time
in office.
--
Tom Stangl
***http://www.vfaq.com/
***DSM Visual FAQ home
***http://ba.dsm.org/
***SF Bay Area DSMs
|
|
Message has 3 Replies: | | Re: Lets keep politics out of Lego
|
| (...) Disagree. "Power corrupts" as they say. So if you want less corruption, make sure your politicians have less power... That's one of the outcomes of Libertarianism, a government that does less, and hence, has less opportunities for graft and (...) (24 years ago, 24-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: Lets keep politics out of Lego
|
| (...) OK, so corruption accumulates over time. This leads to a question: is better to cycle through politicians frequently, and spread low levels of corruption amongst a large number of people, or have just a few long-term politicians, and (...) (24 years ago, 27-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Lets keep politics out of Lego
|
| (...) Unless I miss your intent, the word you're probably aiming for is redundancy. Unless I miss your intent, the word you're probably aiming for is redundancy. (...) Especially given Republicans' long-standing tradition of honesty, integrity, and (...) (24 years ago, 17-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
70 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|