Subject:
|
Re: CODE WORD TIME
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 17 Nov 2000 18:28:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
478 times
|
| |
|
|
Yesterday, NPR talked with a statistician who discussed this point. The current
difference is statistically negligible; it is virtually a tie, you cannot
state with confidence that either person won.
The difference in a total of 6 million vote tally would have to be at least
4000 to be statisically significant and out of the realm of error.
BTW, Gerry, I don't like your attitude.
Paul Sinasohn
LUGNET #115
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: CODE WORD TIME
|
| "Eric McCarthy" <eric@reasoning.com> wrote in message news:3A15557A.3EC6F3...ing.com... (...) have (...) Your point is one that is not being addressed in the media. ARE hand counts more accurate than machine counts? My opinion is that no, they are (...) (24 years ago, 17-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
70 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
