Subject:
|
Re: A few things...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 31 May 2005 19:00:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3204 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
|
Who knows?
|
OK; so you can’t list any then.
| |
I know he aided and abetted terrorists. Whether they were the
actually ones involved in terrorism against the US is anyone’s guess.
|
So you’re guessing now?
|
It’s all a guessing game. We played it safe and took him out for good--
something that should have occured in ‘91.
|
Yeah. Sure. What does a few thousand dead matter.
| |
| |
| |
The
point is that he was a friend of terrorism and an enemy to freedom
|
No doubt the Uzbeks say the same about the USA.
|
No doubt we weren’t talking about them. Start a new thread.
| |
| |
as well > as our allies-- we took him out.
|
So basically, you spent billions and killed tens of thousands to help Israel
|
To help Israel so that they wouldn’t be forced to defend themselves with
nukes against the entire Arab world.
|
**yawn**
| |
| |
hold on to illegally obtained land?
|
You never quit, do you?
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
He used WMDs against
his own people.
|
Yep, and he got them from Washington.
|
I don’t care if he got them from Uranus, it doesn’t justify using them.
|
What is the difference between gassing Kurds and napalming civilians? Why
not start with your own backyard?
|
Squirm. Stay on topic or lose me forever.
|
**sigh**
Your lack of an answer says a lot about you.
|
And your response says EVERYTHING about you. Your very MO is switch and
dodge! Think about it.
|
Actually John, I was highlighting your rank hypocrisy. Morally, I don’t believe
it is correct for you to accuse others of murdering civilians without looking in
your own backyard first.
It is you who are dodging the issue.
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
That means that he had no compunction with associating with
such swine (I chose “swine” because it is particularily offensive to
Muslims) or murdering innocents on a massive scale.
|
What about Washington’s support for “such swine” and its “murdering
innocents on a massive scale”?
|
|
|
|
|
Switch and dodge. (I fell for it, here).
|
Actually John, I was highlighting your rank hypocrisy. Morally, I don’t believe
it is correct for you to accuse others of murdering civilians without looking in
your own backyard first.
It is you who are dodging the issue.
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
See WWII Stalin ally argument.
|
Lol. The Nazi war machine rolled up a whole continent like a fireside rug.
There is no comparison.
|
Sorry. The comparison is spot on. We formed a sort of unholy alliance
with SH when the greater enema was the Ayatolla of Iran.
|
Please don’t forget that the Reagan administration was also selling arms
to Iran.
|
Switch and dodge.
|
Actually John, I was highlighting your rank hypocrisy. It is you who are dodging
the issue.
| |
| |
| |
Same with Stalin against
the Nazis. Get it?
|
OK. Show us how the “Ayatolla of Iran” is in the same league as Nazi
Germany.
|
Switch and dodge.
|
It is you who are dodging the issue.
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
The
threat of continued mass extermination of innocent Iraqis at the hands
of SH is gone.
|
Now the mass graves in Iraq are Bush’s making... and that of his rabid
supporters.
|
Add up body counts if you want to play the numbers game. US colateral
civilian damage vs SH slaughter total.
|
OK. Show me that SH’s ‘kill rate’ in the year before the war was greater
than the time since.
|
Boring. I’m too busy to prove the obvious to you.
|
**sigh**
|
Too busy for your switch and dodge tactics, I should have said.
|
Pathetic.
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
The word is out to terrorists and those who would sponsor
terrorism-- the days of impotent UN sanctions and resolutions are
gone-- we mean business, and we aren’t afraid to act; offensively if
necessary.
|
|
|
But you are afraid to think. You should think about why the threat
exists.
|
You have no idea why the threat exists. You think it is our fault. It
is, if you mean that we don’t happen to believe in radical Islam. Even
garden-variety Muslims aren’t safe from this threat! Don’t you get
that????
|
You really are a scared little man.
|
Of a nuclear attack? You bet. You should be, too.
| |
Bottom line: Washington would have fewer
enemies if it supported freedom and killed less innocent people.
|
We would still be the enemy of OBL.
|
How so?
Scott A
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: A few things...
|
| I know you are, but what am I? I'm not listening! Lalalalala.... I'm rubber and you're glue, whatever you say bounces off of me and sticks to you. ...and, the ultimate retort: Nyahh, nyahh, nyahh. Sorry, I just was trying to raise the level of (...) (19 years ago, 1-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: A few things...
|
| (...) It's all a guessing game. We played it safe and took him out for good-- something that should have occured in '91. (...) No doubt we weren't talking about them. Start a new thread. (...) To help Israel so that they wouldn't be forced to defend (...) (19 years ago, 31-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
82 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
