To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 26938
26937  |  26939
Subject: 
Re: A few things...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 27 May 2005 07:53:44 GMT
Viewed: 
2458 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
   Snipped bunches. Some I agree with (the venality of leaders everywhere, but certainly in the US) and some I don’t (it’s not just “about the oil!”)... focusing on one bit.

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Parsons wrote:

   I saw John’s silly time machine retort. I agree that its important to start with this. Not everyone wanted to go into Iraq, and those that were against were right, and we ought to be respecting this and listening harder. And we ought to be drawing this lesson for the next time this comes up (in respect of say, North Korea, or Syria, or Iran, or Libya, or Saudi Arabia)

What I’m not seeing the current participants in this debate providing is anything beyond “we told you so”... I’m against the war too, I was from the start, but I think it’s important and valid to ask “ok, so what would you do NOW?” That IS a legitimate question and it IS legitimate to ask it and expect some answer to evaluate.

No one’s answering. Which makes this debate not all that interesting really, because it’s a hard and important question. It’s easy to berate past actions but tougher to actually propose a plan.

I’m not sure I agree with any of your summary. However, think about this: If I catch you having sex with your cat; do I have to offer you an alternative in order to suggest you stop? Or is up to you to find an alternative?

Scott A

  
No one’s proposing. What we see instead is questions answered with more questions and positions that can’t be pinned down. Yawn. Answer the hard questions and I’ll be more impressed.



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: A few things...
 
(...) BIGOT! <okay, only kidding> (...) My point which I believe Lar picked up on is this: you expressed laments about continued support for the war. So, I asked, what should we do? Leave? You responded by saying we shouldn't have gone in the first (...) (19 years ago, 27-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: A few things...
 
Snipped bunches. Some I agree with (the venality of leaders everywhere, but certainly in the US) and some I don't (it's not just "about the oil!")... focusing on one bit. (...) What I'm not seeing the current participants in this debate providing is (...) (19 years ago, 27-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

82 Messages in This Thread:


























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR