Subject:
|
Re: A few things...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 27 May 2005 19:41:15 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2771 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Ross Crawford wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
Americans are dying for Iraqi freedom
|
WHAT????? You seem to have conveniently forgotten the war in Iraq was
primarily to remove the “threat” of nuclear weapons
|
What you seem to have never internalized is that we went into Iraq for one
reason, and one reason only-- to depose SH’s evil regime.
|
Rubbish! If it was agreed he had complied with 1441, he would have been
able to stay in power.
|
Correct. Because then we would have been satisfied that he didn’t have WMDs
at his disposal to possibly provide to terrorists.
|
What WMD’s????
But John, what about those poor Iraqis and their thirst for “Freedom”?
| |
<snip off-topic material>
| |
| |
We issued an
ultimatum for him leave or we would make him.
|
That was a couple of days before the war. It is clear that even if he (and
his sons) did leave, Bush would still have invaded.
|
No, Scott, it is not “clear” by any stretch of the imagination. That is your
(ignorant, I might add) opinion.
|
You need to read Plan of Attack.
| |
| |
| |
He didn’t, and we did.
He was the threat, he was the link and sponsor of terrorism.
|
Can you evidence what terror acts against the USA he sponsored?
|
I can say that he sponsored terrorism against Israel.
|
Even if true, he still posed no threat to the USA(?)
| |
He used WMDs against
his own people.
|
Yep, and he got them from Washington.
| |
That means that he had no compunction with associating with
such swine (I chose “swine” because it is particularily offensive to Muslims)
or murdering innocents on a massive scale.
|
What about Washington’s support for “such swine” and its “murdering innocents on
a massive scale”?
| |
That made him public enema number
one.
|
No. Spin did that. It fooled people like you.
| |
| |
| |
The removal
of SH killed two birds with one stone-- increased world safety and
liberating a people from tyranny.
|
Can you evidence how the Iraq war has brought about “increased world
safety”?
|
The threat of WMD falling into the hands of terrorists via SH is gone.
|
Should that read “The invented threat of WMD falling... “?
| |
The
threat of continued mass extermination of innocent Iraqis at the hands of SH
is gone.
|
Now the mass graves in Iraq are Bush’s making... and that of his rabid
supporters.
| |
The word is out to terrorists and those who would sponsor
terrorism-- the days of impotent UN sanctions and resolutions are gone-- we
mean business, and we aren’t afraid to act; offensively if necessary.
|
Tell that to 500+ Uzbeks killed a few days ago by a security force funded by
Washington.
| |
And if we hadn’t taken the fight to the terrorists, do you honestly believe
that the US would have gone almost 4 years without a follow-up attack from
OBL? If so, you are deluding yourself.
|
Perhaps if Washington had defended freedom more before 2001, 911 would never
have happened. Think about that… if you dare.
Scott A
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: A few things...
|
| (...) The ones the UN believed that he hadn't destroyed. (...) What about them? (...) Figures you'd cite someone like Woodward. <yawn> (...) If? That, again, is merely your uninformed opinion. (...) I don't care if he got them from Uranus, it (...) (19 years ago, 28-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: A few things...
|
| (...) Correct. Because then we would have been satisfied that he didn't have WMDs at his disposal to possibly provide to terrorists. <snip off-topic material> (...) No, Scott, it is not "clear" by any stretch of the imagination. That is your (...) (19 years ago, 27-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
82 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
