Subject:
|
Re: A few things...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 26 May 2005 20:20:55 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2554 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
Let’s face it-- SH was an idiot. The guy read the tea leaves all wrong.
This is a guy who presumably had no WMDs, but led the world to believe
that he actually did. A fabrication to which he clung that led to his fall
from power. I’m sure that he didn’t think that the US would have the
temerity to attack despite the misgivings of the UN, which he was well
adept at manipulating.
|
I’m glad to see that revisionist history isn’t limited to the US
administration. Looks as if John has the bug as well.
|
Actually, I don’t adhere to that scenerio. I believe he actually was
hiding WMDs and their whereabouts is still unknown. But since we haven’t
found any, I am willing to concede the above scenerio, which would make SH
out to be an idiot.
|
SH was not the biggest fool on the world stage.
| |
It isn’t “revisionist history” to acknowledge that SH played the UN like a
fiddle (see: “UN oil for food” scandal)
|
You mean the “scandal” aided and abetted by Washington? Who do you think bought that oil and burned it
in their bloated “SUV’s”... your countrymen!
John, you are being played like a fiddle.
Scott A
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: A few things...
|
| (...) Actually, I don't adhere to that scenerio. I believe he actually was hiding WMDs and their whereabouts is still unknown. But since we haven't found any, I am willing to concede the above scenerio, which would make SH out to be an idiot. It (...) (19 years ago, 26-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
82 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
