Subject:
|
Re: level of debate
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 13 Mar 2003 18:09:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
485 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys writes:
> And that in 1940 the xenophobic US weren't in the war at all whilst the
> Allies were fighting and dieing for freedom against tyranny,
Actually, I'd say Joe Steel was fighting *for* tyranny.
> the US didn't
> get into it until the end of '41, but they'll take all the credit for
> winning the war...
The rest of the world starts a stupid war (excuse me, *stOOpid*, can't
emphasize that enough) and has us bail 'em out, and resents it? That chip
on yer shoulder big enough? ;-)
>
> History revisionism at its best, I say.
"Joe Steel fighting for freedom" and you have talk about revisionism?
Okaaaaaaaaay........
>
> Loved my french toast this morning...
"Viva le Quebec libre!"
My french toast was tasty, *and* I didn't have to choke it down. :-)
-->Bruce<--
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: level of debate
|
| (...) Are we talking about the same thing? He marched into Poland, He was on some sort of 'expansionist kick' and the 'eliminating all but the 'Supreme race'. Of course we stood up to that. I wouldn't necessarily call that stOOpid. The war with (...) (22 years ago, 13-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: level of debate
|
| (...) And that in 1940 the xenophobic US weren't in the war at all whilst the Allies were fighting and dieing for freedom against tyranny, the US didn't get into it until the end of '41, but they'll take all the credit for winning the war... History (...) (22 years ago, 13-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
82 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
